• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Report: Kavanaugh won’t commit to recusal from Trump/Mueller related matters

wakephan09 said:
Creamy, you're pissed off that allegations you disagree with revealed to America that kav is unfit for SCOTUS?

Also, I don't remember many, if any, dems saying that they didn't think he did it. If anything, CBF's testimony just strengthened their belief.
Click to expand...

The allegations have proved nothing. Kavanaugh is just as a fit to be a SCOTUS as any sitting judge right now. I don’t take back that I don’t really like the guy, but it’s beyond obvious what’s going on here.
 
CreamyGoodness said:
What pisses me off the most is the dems having the gall to walk back the goal posts and say “Well he probably didn’t do this, but look at how he reacts to being accused of a horrible crime! He came unhinged! He isn’t fit for the court.” It’s all just so dishonest and immoral that any level headed person can read right through it. If this is the new standard, that we just believe every accusation regardless of its merit we’re in for a pretty fucked society. Buckle up buckaroos.
Click to expand...

What Democrats are now saying he "probably didn't do this?" I don't know of any who think this, on the contrary, they found her charges to be credible and firmly believe that he did it. As do I. It's not that hard to see Kavanaugh doing it. Again, even you said earlier today that you didn't like the guy. How are they moving the goalposts?
 
CreamyGoodness said:
The allegations have proved nothing. Kavanaugh is just as a fit to be a SCOTUS as any sitting judge right now. I don’t take back that I don’t really like the guy, but it’s beyond obvious what’s going on here.
Click to expand...

Why don’t you think Blasey Ford was credible?
 
CreamyGoodness said:
The allegations have proved nothing. Kavanaugh is just as a fit to be a SCOTUS as any sitting judge right now. I don’t take back that I don’t really like the guy, but it’s beyond obvious what’s going on here.
Click to expand...

BK committed perjury. He is not qualified.
 
PhDeac said:
Why don’t you think Blasey Ford was credible?
Click to expand...

I don’t think that me not finding enough evidence to consider Kav a rapist or attempted rapist means I don’t find Dr. Ford credible. I think Dr. Ford probably did have a traumatic experience when she was a teenager. I think she could have been manipulated by certain people in her life to warp that memory into what it is now. If she had any shred of corroborating evidence or contemporaneous witnesses then I’d be singing a much different tune.
 
My Facebook feed is full of women discussing how all this has triggered ugly memories of times they’ve been assaulted. I feel like if Creamy and Junebug knew women who had been assaulted as opposed to stepford lady Pubs who don’t think they’re equal to men, they’d be more sympathetic to Blasey Ford and other survivors.
 
Last edited:
DeaconSig said:
BECAUSE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE!*


*except for her credible testimony.
Click to expand...

This is the kind of post that discredits you and the rest of th groupthink dems around here. At least PH, Phan and others have some substance and tact in their posts.
 
PhDeac said:
My Facebook feed is full of women discussing how all this has triggered ugly memories of times they’ve been assaulted. I feel like if Creamy and Junebug knew women who had been assault as opposed to stepford lady Pubs who don’t think they’re equal to men, they’d be more sympathetic to Blasey Ford and other survivors.
Click to expand...

Dude, weak. Just gave you a positive shoutout in my last post for my being a total d bag and then you pull out something lime this. As you guys line to say *anecdotes
 
One of the first polls about Thursday's hearings is out. YouGov's poll showed that a slightly higher number of people believe Ford's testimony as opposed to Kavanaugh's, that few people's minds were changed by the hearings, that who people believed was based largely on partisan lines, and that Kavanaugh's standing is about the same afterwards as before the hearings. 41% believed Ford's testimony as opposed to 30% who did not, 35% thought Kavanaugh was telling the truth as opposed to 38% who did not. 38% thought that Kavanaugh definitely lied at some points in his testimony, as opposed to 30% thinking that about Ford. However, those who actually watched the hearings thought that Ford was telling the truth by a 52 to 36 percent margin, but only 44% thought that Kavanaugh was telling to truth, as opposed to 46% who didn't.

73% of Democrats thought that Ford was telling the truth, but only 14% of Republicans, while 74% of Republicans, and only 11% of Democrats, thought that Kavanaugh was telling the truth. Independents were almost evenly split - 33% for Ford, 32% for Kavanaugh. There were some slight differences between GOP men and women - 69% of GOP men said that Ford was lying, while 59% of GOP women did. One interesting fact: 65% of people who oppose Kavanaugh's appointment said that the Supreme Court would be a major factor in their vote in November, while only 50% of those who support him said that it would matter. Usually that number favors the GOP, but not this year. Overall, 41% oppose Kavanaugh's nomination, while 36% support it.

2 articles about the poll: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/409093-poll-shows-split-views-on-kavanaugh-ford-after-dramatic-hearing. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/kavanaugh-blasey-ford-polling-testimony_us_5bafbb33e4b0c75759659b5d
 
Last edited:
CreamyGoodness said:
I don’t think that me not finding enough evidence to consider Kav a rapist or attempted rapist means I don’t find Dr. Ford credible. I think Dr. Ford probably did have a traumatic experience when she was a teenager. I think she could have been manipulated by certain people in her life to warp that memory into what it is now. If she had any shred of corroborating evidence or contemporaneous witnesses then I’d be singing a much different tune.
Click to expand...

If you think she was manipulated, then you don’t think she was credible. So you think some Dem operative somehow found out from her therapist that she was assaulted at 15 and convinced her it was Kavanaugh.

You still haven’t explained what you want. You want someone who was also assaulting her to come forward and say he did it? Like the guy the GOP didn’t allow to testify?

You want a witness? Again, who are these guys who are trying to rape women in public? Brock Turner? He got a slap on the wrist.

What’s your angle?
 
PhDeac said:
If you think she was manipulated, then you don’t think she was credible. So you think some Dem operative somehow found out from her therapist that she was assaulted at 15 and convinced her it was Kavanaugh.

You still haven’t explained what you want. You want someone who was also assaulting her to come forward and say he did it? Like the guy the GOP didn’t allow to testify?

You want a witness? Again, who are these guys who are trying to rape women in public? Brock Turner? He got a slap on the wrist.

What’s your angle?
Click to expand...

Brock turner? Dem operative? You’re misinterpreting everything I’m saying or just being dense. Either way it isn’t worth the time. I’ll give you guys back your safe space and hop on outta here.
 
CreamyGoodness said:
Brock turner? Dem operative? You’re misinterpreting everything I’m saying or just being dense. Either way it isn’t worth the time. I’ll give you guys back your safe space and hop on outta here.
Click to expand...

You’re asking for an witness to an attempted rape. I gave a recent example of a public rapist who was stopped by witness.

I have no idea who you think manipulated her. That theory is so far out there. I made the only connection that kind of made sense.
 
Reporting live from a Boston bar during college football while taking a shit. Real America is with Kavanaugh

e67cf455613875e104bfeb3167701091.jpg


f14d8b036fb3c533518b1c82344e14a6.jpg
 
CreamyGoodness said:
I don’t think that me not finding enough evidence to consider Kav a rapist or attempted rapist means I don’t find Dr. Ford credible. I think Dr. Ford probably did have a traumatic experience when she was a teenager. I think she could have been manipulated by certain people in her life to warp that memory into what it is now. If she had any shred of corroborating evidence or contemporaneous witnesses then I’d be singing a much different tune.
Click to expand...

CreamyGoodness said:
This is the kind of post that discredits you and the rest of th groupthink dems around here. At least PH, Phan and others have some substance and tact in their posts.
Click to expand...

Groupthink yet you spout the conservative line that she was assaulted, it just wasn't Kavanaugh. Then, as if she wasn't traumatized enough, you propose that Democrats warped her memory to have her perform at the last minute to derail the hearing. I'm glad you know that it's "beyond obvious what's going on here."
 
At this point I’m fine pulling the plug on him, and trump nominating the absolutely most conservative female judge even somewhat qualified. Cav is fairly moderate, dems want to play games then let’s go.
 
PhDeac said:
So why didn’t the Dems find some sexual assault victim to lie about Gorsuch?

Why did Dems force out Al Franken?

Your perspective just doesn’t pass the logic test.
Click to expand...

Not the same stakes, plus I think they were still reeling from the trump win

Stick to Disney

Leave politics to those of us not brainwashed by msnbc
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top