You’re just trolling at this point.
It’s almost as though the Bryant and Hines situations were quite different. Go figure.
You’re just trolling at this point.
It’s almost as though the Bryant and Hines situations were quite different. Go figure.
If you're an alpha dog, like most top QBs are, you want to be the leader and the starter, not the back up.
And most will do whatever they can, including transferring to get that position.
I know pro sports are somewhat different, but the mentality is the same. One might question why a player isn't happy as a back up if he's making millions of dollars. It's because he wants to start. Play me or trade me.
Except they were very similar in the exact way you described.
C’mon, must I spell this out for you? Hines had been at Oregon for all of 2 months when he made his decision, he wasn’t contributing even when available, he was injured and needed time to heal, he was at a mediocre program, he was not receiving any media attention, and he wasn’t a leader on the team. None of this was true for Bryant.
In my opinion, Hines made a good decision and Bryant made a bad one.
A failure to account for nuance leads to error.
It’s nuts that people are so upset about a backup transferring to get more playing time especially when the guy graduated from college.
It’s nuts that people are so upset about a backup transferring to get more playing time especially when the guy graduated from college.
Agree.
Thought this thread was supposed to be about Carolina decommits so we could all say bad things about them.
Well except the ones we want to recruit. Those are fine upstanding young men.
Or he realizes, like the rest of us, that this coaching change is not going to help.
I agree. Drop the thread. Carowhina has a coach now. Some guys will drop, some will join. Why do we give a shut? I don't.
From IC:I agree but my Carolina friends think they are going to be a national football powerhouse.