KanhojiAngre
I LIKE FUCKING MY COUSINS
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 7,872
- Reaction score
- 25
If you want to argue that Maryland didn't capitalize on the natty, then yeah, you're right. We didn't. But that's a world different than saying that a program that hadn't won the ACC in 20 years and was perpetually on the bubble was past UMD as the 3rd best program in the ACC. That's just patently insane. They were clearly worse on every level.
Yeah, except in the conference standings, which kinda matters a little.
For all the pointing at banners at short-term peaks of success, they seem to have done very little good anywhere in the ACC in the long term -- Wake under Odom, Georgia Tech under Hewitt, Maryland under Williams. State had a better, more consistent foundation than any of them did after their brief spike of achievement that earned them nothing in the long term. State won 28 ACC games in those last 3 years, while Maryland won only 22 and didn't finish above .500 or 6th place in any of them.
Regardless of what State fans may have thought, 5 straight tourney berths proves pretty tough to achieve and IMO, the only thing Sendek needed to put the floor in under the success on the court was the fans to be behind him.
Current schools with more than 5 straight NCAA tournament berths under the same coach in a Big Six conference, just to show how tough it is.
Streak Team Conference
22 Kansas Big 12 (Self has 8)
16 Duke ACC
14 Michigan St. Big Ten
13 Texas Big 12
13 Wisconsin Big Ten
10 Pittsburgh Big East (Dixon has 7)
7 Villanova Big East
6 Tennessee SEC (Obviously ignominious now)
That's it. Williams never got past 2 in a row after his once-a-career group left.
How many of those have won a game in each of the last 3 years in the tournament, as State did in its last 3 years under Sendek? Not Tennessee. Not Texas. Not Villanova. Not Michigan State.
Obviously no one's stupid enough to think this means NC State was a better program than UCLA, Arizona, North Carolina...but it does mean that 5 straight berths is nothing to sneeze at.
And Duke was down right after Sendek left, so it's not like Maryland didn't have its chance to take advantage. It's been a decade now...you can't live on a Final Four run forever. Ask Paul Hewitt. And Maryland hasn't accomplished anything more since Sendek left than they did in his last 3 years at State. If State had stayed where it was and putting up top 4 finishes like they did in 4 of 5 years, which would you say would be better? So therefore, which was better then? The answer is obvious and if not for 2009-2010, Williams might be out of a job right now.
Last edited: