WFFaithful
Well-known member
Good post.
Rand Paul didn’t say it because republicans are feckless and weak in the face of the media, but yes it is ok for Trump to do what every other politician does without anyone giving a shit
I mean the DNC getting opposition research on Trump via the brits is a legit question though?
That’s been their only legit defense for a while now
Isn’t the only difference is that we assume the DNC did it with a low level staffer yet Trump is doing it from the oval with hundreds of millions in aid as leverage?
I mean the DNC getting opposition research on Trump via the brits is a legit question though?
That’s been their only legit defense for a while now
Isn’t the only difference is that we assume the DNC did it with a low level staffer yet Trump is doing it from the oval with hundreds of millions in aid as leverage?
I mean the DNC getting opposition research on Trump via the brits is a legit question though?
That’s been their only legit defense for a while now
Isn’t the only difference is that we assume the DNC did it with a low level staffer yet Trump is doing it from the oval with hundreds of millions in aid as leverage?
Rand Paul didn’t say it because republicans are feckless and weak in the face of the media, but yes it is ok for Trump to do what every other politician does without anyone giving a shit
The problem is not that there was a quid pro quo. The problem is that the president withheld aid which makes an ally and therefore this country less safe IN EXCHANGE for something that benefits only him
It definitely matters. The terminology is what Republicans will defend Trump against. Extortion is a much better term than quid pro quo.
It’s not really bribery, it’s extortion but the terminology point hardly matters