• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

ALL PRAISE JOHN CURRIE FOR ACTING A YEAR TOO LATE

Getting rid of Strick is nice but rj is still the absolute worst part of these boards. And the contract was fully guaranteed.
 
Crickets????

Where are the admissions of being wrong?

I'm looking for Gabriel Bryne, Giancarlo Esposito and Kevin Spacey...
 
I stand by what I posted earlier, although now I’ll grant you that you have confirmed a first tier source. I remain unconvinced that your source is better than Goodman’s or BabyDeacs, mainly because the large buyout explains the long delay and we will never know the number.
 
For a year RJ has been telling anyone who would listen Goodman's $18M($15M) numbers were bullshit. And it came true
 
I stand by what I posted earlier, although now I’ll grant you that you have confirmed a first tier source. I remain unconvinced that your source is better than Goodman’s or BabyDeacs, mainly because the large buyout explains the long delay and we will never know the number.

From what I've been told from my source, Goodman is wrong just like he was wrong about our coaching situation this Spring. Doesn't his being wrong this year have any impact? Goodman isn't a guy with a lot of Wake history. If his info was as wrong as it was recently, why wouldn't he be as wrong before?

BabyDeac and I have discussed this. We may not be far apart, but it would be far less than Goodman.
 
Buyout was $8M

That’s the number a bunch of blue hairs floated around last basketball season...So, hey, that’s something.
 
So, based on RJ's claim, proposed terms:

RJ sends unedited screenshots to BabyDeac. If the screenshots show that RJ had a direct conversation with a Hatch/Wellman/Currie/BOT/Shah/Sutton level source that confirmed that the initial buyout was significantly less than $18 million (<50%?), then OGB will receive a lifetime IP ban and cannot post under any screen name. If not, than RJ will receive the IP and posting ban.

Does this sound right?

Should also clarify if the source both 1) would know the details accurately and 2) does NOT have a vested interest in playing down the buyout story. It would definitely be in the best interests of the high up mucky mucks at Wake to get everyone to think the buyout was low.

Yes, I'm in

What part of that isn't clear to you?

Still waiting for a response to see what isn't clear about the above. The terms laid out required RJ to prove that he had a direct conversation with a source (i.e. not funneled through another person) and that confirmed that the initial buyout was 50% or less of the reported $18 million. So far, RJ has failed to produce evidence satisfying either prong and therefore faces an IP ban. I propose that we give BabyDeac 24 hours from his initial post to confirm or deny, and then the mods will proceed with the ban.
 
I'm also getting the feeling that this text screenshot may have been forwarded to RJ from a friend (i.e. he did not communicate directly with the Pier 1 source).
 
no one is or should get banned over this. RJ didn't prove what OGB is asking for above, but he never agreed to get banned on those terms. He did prove that he has a good source. I vote we let this go and let this thread die.
 
how about we just ban all talk about Danny Manning, the terms "DFL" and "paint touches," Goodman, and the buyout or lack thereof
 
Buyout was $8M

That’s the number a bunch of blue hairs floated around last basketball season...So, hey, that’s something.

So it was the high end of my "guesstimate". That would make sense give his base was about $2-2.3M. That would make the $8M logical after the threat of going to court.
 
Take the L here and beg for mercy fellas, this is beyond pathetic.

They can't. It would destroy a cornerstone of their board existence which is RJ knows nothing and knows no one.

But thanks for trying.
 
RJ, can you just confirm if you texted directly with the Pier 1 source, or if you received the text forwarded from a friend? Helps complete the narrative imho.
 
I'm done with proving anything. It doesn't matter what I say and then prove. You and others will look for another contingency or another excuse.

DCDeac and I probably disagree much more than we agree. Even he is saying "take the L".

But thanks to you and others for proving that even after the person the group chooses for verification that's it's not enough to admit the name calling and character insults over the past 15-18 months was unwarranted and wrong. Keep blaming me for your behavior. It's so becoming.

I have nothing left to prove here. I've proven my information and I've proven that none of those who have treated me so poorly have any class or manners.
 
Just a reminder that ALL OF THIS could have been avoided if Hatch had just given Maya Smart a tenured professorship!!!!!!!!!!! #SAUCES

RJ is getting played.
 
Last edited:
I'm done with proving anything. It doesn't matter what I say and then prove. You and others will look for another contingency or another excuse.

DCDeac and I probably disagree much more than we agree. Even he is saying "take the L".

But thanks to you and others for proving that even after the person the group chooses for verification that's it's not enough to admit the name calling and character insults over the past 15-18 months was unwarranted and wrong. Keep blaming me for your behavior. It's so becoming.

I have nothing left to prove here. I've proven my information and I've proven that none of those who have treated me so poorly have any class or manners.

Wait, WTF? Was this directed at me? I've believed you from the beginning (despite my Breaking Bad gif to stir the pot), as I thought Goodman's numbers were wrong. Just asked a clarifying question re: the source.
 
If I mistook your position, I'm sorry.

But my position stands. I've done more than I needed to do. There will always be a "but" and I understand it.

I'm done saying or proving about this.
 
Wait, WTF? Was this directed at me? I've believed you from the beginning (despite my Breaking Bad gif to stir the pot), as I thought Goodman's numbers were wrong. Just asked a clarifying question re: the source.

It doesn't matter whatever you've posted about in the past. If you say anything rj could construe as negative towards him (like disagreeing with a position or asking him to clarify) then it means that you have been part of HUNDREDS of vicious personal attacks against him.
 
Back
Top