Well, Sccoter, then is it difficult to find the corresponding right to various elements of privacy as illuminated in Griswold, Loving, and Obergefell, just to start?
I am no expert on any of these issues, for the record.
As long as you are talking about a medical procedure that an individual may decide to have done, or not have done, then it makes sense for privacy to be an issue. But I think everyone agrees that at some point during a pregnancy, considering an abortion is no longer an individual deciding on a medical procedure - it becomes an issue involving two lives and the procedure's impact on each of them. At that point it doesn't seem like a simple matter of privacy or personal choice any longer.
If you think about it, the only real question here is when does that inflection point occur. Pro-life people believe it occurs at conception, or very soon after. Pro-abortion-rights people believe it occurs much later - I guess opinions differ but maybe at viability?
The "Pro-choice" crowd was genius when they framed the argument as one about "choice" or "body autonomy" - when that is not really what the issue is at all. The issue is when does that fetus become a life worth protecting - A life with rights of its own?
I am basically a pro-life person but recognize that, especially early in a pregnancy, the mother's life should take precedence over the fetus - so that exceptions for the health of the mother, including mental health damage in instances of rape, incest, extreme youth of the mother, etc. should be made.
I realize I am a man - an old, white man at that - and so will never be in the position of being pregnant with an unwelcome baby. I know that makes my opinion repugnant to many. So be it. These are heart-wrenching situations and better support and education are needed all around.