• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Trump White House's Mishandling of Classified Material

PhDeac said:
“Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed by Trump, directed Dearie to issue interim reports and recommendations "as appropriate" during the review, which she ordered to be complete by Nov. 30, closer to the timeline request by the Trump lawyers. The government wanted the review done by mid-October.”

Blatant stall tactic. Hopefully it will backfire.
Click to expand...
Vintage king t rump stalling.... and after the election at that.

Hopefully he finally gets bit in the ass and doesn't skate this time.
 
Any guesses as to what the Circuit Court does on Tuesday? Toss all of Cannon's strange rulings or let the unusual stand?
 
Given that Trump has gotten what he wants at every step of the legal process the last 6+ years, I don't expect them to do a thing.
 
Liquid Karma said:
Given that Trump has gotten what he wants at every step of the legal process the last 6+ years, I don't expect them to do a thing.
Click to expand...
The DOJ and the Judiciary need to make sure they don’t appear to be too political!
 
Honestly I think there will always be some institutionalized reluctance to prosecute a president/former president, whether they say it out loud or not. And that will filter down to judges who will err on the side of not appearing political.

We all know it's wrong, and it sucks that the rule of law has never been more starkly laid bare as a complete farce for those in power.
 
It just took an absolute lunatic to be so overt about ignoring the law and basically challenging the judicial branch to so something about it.
 
For all the talk of checks and balances, the judiciary seems hesitant to check the President for anything but political reasons.
 
Liquid Karma said:
Honestly I think there will always be some institutionalized reluctance to prosecute a president/former president, whether they say it out loud or not. And that will filter down to judges who will err on the side of not appearing political.

We all know it's wrong, and it sucks that the rule of law has never been more starkly laid bare as a complete farce for those in power.
Click to expand...
My jokey comment was trying to say that in a supposed effort to appear apolitical, the DOJ and the Judiciary are in fact being overtly proTrump.
 
So the special master wants Trump to claim in court that they believe the FBI planted documents.
 
How does the 11th circuit decision interact with the special master situation? Does it supersede his authority?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top