• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

'17 Specials & '18 Midterms Thread

This could go on several threads. I’ll put here. Best read on the site but I’ll quote below as it’s behind a paywall.

Why It Can Happen Here: We’re very close to becoming another Poland or Hungary.


Soon after the fall of the Berlin Wall, a friend of mine — an expert on international relations — made a joke: “Now that Eastern Europe is free from the alien ideology of Communism, it can return to its true historical path — fascism.” Even at the time, his quip had a real edge.

And as of 2018 it hardly seems like a joke at all. What Freedom House calls illiberalism is on the rise across Eastern Europe. This includes Poland and Hungary, both still members of the European Union, in which democracy as we normally understand it is already dead.

In both countries the ruling parties — Law and Justice in Poland, Fidesz in Hungary — have established regimes that maintain the forms of popular elections, but have destroyed the independence of the judiciary, suppressed freedom of the press, institutionalized large-scale corruption and effectively delegitimized dissent. The result seems likely to be one-party rule for the foreseeable future.

And it could all too easily happen here. There was a time, not long ago, when people used to say that our democratic norms, our proud history of freedom, would protect us from such a slide into tyranny. In fact, some people still say that. But believing such a thing today requires willful blindness. The fact is that the Republican Party is ready, even eager, to become an American version of Law and Justice or Fidesz, exploiting its current political power to lock in permanent rule.

Just look at what has been happening at the state level.

In North Carolina, after a Democrat won the governorship, Republicans used the incumbent’s final days to pass legislation stripping the governor’s office of much of its power.

In Georgia, Republicans tried to use transparently phony concerns about access for disabled voters to close most of the polling places in a mainly black district.

In West Virginia, Republican legislators exploited complaints about excessive spending to impeach the entire State Supreme Court and replace it with party loyalists.

And these are just the cases that have received national attention. There are surely scores if not hundreds of similar stories across the nation. What all of them reflect is the reality that the modern G.O.P. feels no allegiance to democratic ideals; it will do whatever it thinks it can get away with to entrench its power.

What about developments at the national level? That’s where things get really scary. We’re currently sitting on a knife edge. If we fall off it in the wrong direction — specifically, if Republicans retain control of both houses of Congress in November — we will become another Poland or Hungary faster than you can imagine.

This week Axios created a bit of a stir with a scoop about a spreadsheet circulating among Republicans in Congress, listing investigations they think Democrats are likely to carry out if they take the House. The thing about the list is that every item on it — starting with Donald Trump’s tax returns — is something that obviously should be investigated, and would have been investigated under any other president. But the people circulating the document simply take it for granted that Republicans won’t address any of these issues: Party loyalty will prevail over constitutional responsibility.

Many Trump critics celebrated last week’s legal developments, taking the Manafort conviction and the Cohen guilty plea as signs that the walls may finally be closing in on the lawbreaker in chief. But I felt a sense of deepened dread as I watched the Republican reaction: Faced with undeniable evidence of Trump’s thuggishness, his party closed ranks around him more tightly than ever.

A year ago it seemed possible that there might be limits to the party’s complicity, that there would come a point where at least a few representatives or senators would say, no more. Now it’s clear that there are no limits: They’ll do whatever it takes to defend Trump and consolidate power.

This goes even for politicians who once seemed to have some principles. Senator Susan Collins of Maine was a voice of independence in the health care debate; now she sees no problem with having a president who’s an unindicted co-conspirator appoint a Supreme Court justice who believes that presidents are immune from prosecution. Senator Lindsey Graham denounced Trump in 2016, and until recently seemed to be standing up against the idea of firing the attorney general to kill the Mueller investigation; now he’s signaled that he’s O.K. with such a firing.

But why is America, the birthplace of democracy, so close to following the lead of other countries that have recently destroyed it?

Don’t tell me about “economic anxiety.” That’s not what happened in Poland, which grew steadily through the financial crisis and its aftermath. And it’s not what happened here in 2016: Study after study has found that racial resentment, not economic distress, drove Trump voters.

The point is that we’re suffering from the same disease — white nationalism run wild — that has already effectively killed democracy in some other Western nations. And we’re very, very close to the point of no return.
 
Last big day of primaries with Florida and Arizona up.

Scroll down on this tweet to see a congressional candidate earning a vote:

 
Here's a cool FL turnout graphic.

motion-20180826.gif
 
@ConnorEl

1984 and Brave New World are usually required school reading, but It Can't Happen Here has been more relevant over the past couple decades, and is much more overlooked.
 
It's being reported that the Russians tried to break into the Dem candidate who lost the primary in my district over 1000 times. Theoretically, they were unsuccessful. The difference between winning and losing was 125 votes.
 

Especially since there are other candidates that likely went through the security clearance process.

Though it is interesting that they tried to launder it through the media. I wonder if they were afraid it would backfire if it came from Paul Ryan's PAC.
 
Tight Dem gov race in FL. Polls had Andrew Gillum third, yet he's less than a point behind the favorite Gwen Graham.
 
Tight Dem gov race in FL. Polls had Andrew Gillum third, yet he's less than a point behind the favorite Gwen Graham.

Who has the best chance of winning the general election in November? As you said in another post, Nelson is going to need some strong coattails from a Dem gubernatorial candidate to have a shot at beating Scott.
 
Looks like the county north of Miami posted all at once and pushed Gillum into the lead :eek:

Still super close.
 
Who has the best chance of winning the general election in November? As you said in another post, Nelson is going to need some strong coattails from a Dem gubernatorial candidate to have a shot at beating Scott.

Gillum. Graham doesn't excite anybody. Every woman I know is all in for Gillum.
 
Yeah. Graham vs. Putnam was considered a given until Trump endorsed Disantis.

Putnam has been running for governor at least ever since I’ve been in FL. He first ran for the house as a 26 year old. He was in house leadership at 32. I saw him in a friendly debate on Social Security against future Dem Gov candidate Jim Davis. Putnam was impressive. I actually voted for him. He was more of a moderate in the House but turned toward ugly Pub politics during Obama.

He’s only 44. He was groomed to be governor. For him to lose to a younger candidate with less name recognition is stunning.

Gillum and DeSantis are both in their 30s. Florida is going to have a young governor.
 
Yeah. Graham vs. Putnam was considered a given until Trump endorsed Disantis.

Putnam has been running for governor at least ever since I’ve been in FL. He first ran for the house as a 26 year old. He was in house leadership at 32. I saw him in a friendly debate on Social Security against future Dem Gov candidate Jim Davis. Putnam was impressive. I actually voted for him. He was more of a moderate in the House but turned toward ugly Pub politics during Obama.

He’s only 44. He was groomed to be governor. For him to lose to a younger candidate with less name recognition is stunning.

Gillum and DeSantis are both in their 30s. Florida is going to have a young governor.

What chance do you think DeSantis has to win? If he's Trump's favorite, then I'm assuming he's somewhere to the right of Jesse Helms.
 
I think it's 50/50. Dems have to turnout. Republicans will definitely show up for DeSantis. Gillum only got about a third of the vote. Will the other 2/3 support him? I liked his chances of carrying the banner than the others, but it will be tough.

It's interesting to see how region played a role. Graham grew up in Miami-Dade and moved to Tallahassee as a kid when her dad became governor. Levine grew up in Broward (Ft. Lauderdale) and became mayor of Miami Beach. So you'd think each would have some kind of advantage in those areas, probably Graham in Leon County and the pandhandle and Levine in South Florida.

Nope. Gillum grew up in a low income neighborhood in Miami. He was the first in his family to graduate from high school and the first to go to college. He went to FAMU in Tallahassee and moved up from FAMU student government to city council to mayor. And guess what? He won Miami-Dade and Broward big and carried much of the panhandle including Tallahassee and Pensacola. He took Graham and Levine's advantages.

I sensed a lot of momentum building for Gillum. I think he was convincing people that he could win. It was similar to Obama building momentum against Hillary going into Iowa.
 
I have a feeling the moderates/independents in FL are going to feel that they don't have a candidate in the governors race. At least based on what the stories will be. DeSantis has supported Trump and Trump has supported him, so the Gillum camp will obviously try to drive home everything that is wrong about Trump. On the other hand, I would think that the DeSantis camp will paint Gillum as a combination of career politician and Bernie Sanders socialist. At least from a shallow narrative standpoint, it seems like a battle of pretty hard right versus pretty hard left.
 
Gillum barely mentions Trump in his stump speech. He's not going to need to. DeSantis is going to tie himself to Trump.
 
 
Back
Top