JuiceCrewAllStar
Whole Milk Drinker
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 37,182
- Reaction score
- 9,922
It is true that there are free courts all over, but tennis is an expensive sport to be good at
This is correct - it’s a very outdated stereotype. Tennis can be a relatively inexpensive sport because there are free courts all over the place. My kids have played all youth sports - basketball, baseball, soccer, football, etc - and youth tennis has by far the most diverse participants.
Regardless of whether tennis is diverse, here are Harvard's tennis teams
These are the kids gaining acceptance to Harvard as athletes and paying tuition because Harvard does not have athletic scholarships.
Yeah...that’s from 2006 and doesn’t include Asians. But good try.
Here’s some more relevant data, if you’re interested. On Sept 30, 2019, of the top 100 ranked boys 14s in North Carolina, 35% are black, Asian, or Hispanic.
How is the makeup of the top 100 in one state at one point of time anywhere close to relevant to the overall diversity of players?
Tennis is just one of the sports mentioned in this article. This discussion is just obscuring the broader point.
That’s not what the article says.
Because it’s current, accurate, and we were discussing youth sports.
I’ll take irrelevant small sample size for $600 Alex.
If you have some current data with all racial groups included, please post it.
I’ve posted a study that includes nationwide data from this decade that shows an apples to apples comparison between tennis and other sports.
All you have are #anecdotes.
You posted data from 2006 (you really need to work on critical reading skills). I posted data from last week.