I've got a question about the OJ trial, but it could be about any trial.
When OJ put on the gloves, why didn't the prosecution get a chance to cross-examine him? Isn't his action of putting them on testifying about the gloves?
Maybe I'm wrong, but he effectively tried to tell the jury he didn't use those gloves. Why didn't have to take the stand to be cross-examined?
When OJ put on the gloves, why didn't the prosecution get a chance to cross-examine him? Isn't his action of putting them on testifying about the gloves?
Maybe I'm wrong, but he effectively tried to tell the jury he didn't use those gloves. Why didn't have to take the stand to be cross-examined?