Really odd for the ACC to take this position. The conference benefits when the best players choose to play in the ACC. To essentially force a quality player to choose to play in another conference (Big East or SEC) is beyond dumb as it means a competing conference will be better. How does that help the ACC or the member schools? What if Bey goes to Vandy and they beat out ND for the last spot in the NCAAs next year? Is that what the ACC wants?
Wonder if the ACC would take this position if a transcendent HS player (e.g., Marvin Bagley Jr. last year) and an ACC school (lets say L'ville) mutually parted ways after an LOI was signed. Would the ACC really block Bagley from playing his one college year at Duke, if L'ville voluntarily released him from his LOI? How would then ACC benefit if Bagley then chose to play at Arizona or Kentucky and lead one of those teams to the Final 4?
I get the rule if an ACC school didn't voluntarily release him from his LOI, but when a school and recruit, voluntarily decide to divorce, it's in the ACC interest for the kid to remain in conference rather than help another team in another conference.
Just seems like the decision-makers are not thinking this thing through.