wsc8521s
Rusty Larue
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2011
- Messages
- 17,160
- Reaction score
- 861
I haven't though. Paul had more potential and obviously became a better player but he wasn't a better college player.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I suppose we can't get a fair verdict here since we're both super biased, but I find it very hard to believe a majority -- or even let's say 20% -- of neutral observers would back this claim. Again, biased, but this strikes me as one of the dumbest arguments put forth on these boards.
Paul's court vision was amazeballs. He produced. And he won, with a team that turned into a bunch of donkeys the second he left
Last edited: