gouda
Scooter Banks
- Joined
- May 14, 2014
- Messages
- 17,324
- Reaction score
- 562
I'm fine with looking at anyone who voted for manning yesterday. And townie.
Join me on townie
I'm fine with looking at anyone who voted for manning yesterday. And townie.
Sweet. Let's do this quickly then and get it over with.
My tone is off because
1. I'm annoyed as shit that I come into a thread that started just a few hours ago to be called out for being quiet by someone that posts nothing but banter in a thread that had JUST OPENED when I had just fucking woken up and I don't post until late in the day on day 1 to begin with. Pretty much every single game for all of eternity.
2. That automatically "makes me mafia" and "off". Which annoys me and "makes me look more like mafia". Fuck it.
3. Your group think this game is way worse than usual and that is not a good thing and it is going to continue to annoy me and I am going to be hostile toward it because that is NOT GOOD FOR THE CIVS. So if that is a problem for you, please kill me because I'm not going to go along with it. If you are a civ, you shouldn't want me to go along with the group think.
and is that a vote for d14 or dv7?
because dv7 is actually obviously mafia.
Read
That’s a hell of a read off 3.5 posts.
Well that's kind of the point. He has posted an entry vote (I'm actually proud of him for that), one post opening D2 claiming being visited which is non-determinative for alignment, and his other two posts are questions that don't drive any substantive discussion but come across as trying to look active.
manning's mafia picks were nonny, bym and boston. none of them had a meaningful vote.
Well that's kind of the point. He has posted an entry vote (I'm actually proud of him for that), one post opening D2 claiming being visited which is non-determinative for alignment, and his other two posts are questions that don't drive any substantive discussion but come across as trying to look active.
The part where you defended manning is probably not helping.
Who are you talking about
There’s that and his one substantive post of the game where he defended a manning policy lynch.
Who are you talking about
Well that's kind of the point. He has posted an entry vote (I'm actually proud of him for that), one post opening D2 claiming being visited which is non-determinative for alignment, and his other two posts are questions that don't drive any substantive discussion but come across as trying to look active.
I have zero clue what manning apparently did to enrage everyone in the entire mafia universe last game(s). But it was pretty apparent he wasn't being killed because of anything he did this game. He didn't do anything to me that looked clearly bad. He looked like manning. Which pretty much (no offense manning) often looks bad/defensive/half-insane most of the time. And people were insistent on killing him. That isn't super helpful really. And when he is a civ in the end game he does his job most often anymore. Or has when I have seen him there. Enough that it would at least, in my mind, have been beneficial to at least have tried to kill mafia day one and not just blindly lynch him because it was him.
Sweet. Let's do this quickly then and get it over with.
My tone is off because
1. I'm annoyed as shit that I come into a thread that started just a few hours ago to be called out for being quiet by someone that posts nothing but banter in a thread that had JUST OPENED when I had just fucking woken up and I don't post until late in the day on day 1 to begin with. Pretty much every single game for all of eternity.
2. That automatically "makes me mafia" and "off". Which annoys me and "makes me look more like mafia". Fuck it.
3. Your group think this game is way worse than usual and that is not a good thing and it is going to continue to annoy me and I am going to be hostile toward it because that is NOT GOOD FOR THE CIVS. So if that is a problem for you, please kill me because I'm not going to go along with it. If you are a civ, you shouldn't want me to go along with the group think.