Better game Coach? [Redacted] or Manning?

[Seizures]

 

[liveanddiedeac]

Between two piles of shit, one might smell not quite as bad as the other, but they're both still piles of shit.

 

[dmcheatw]

so turd sandwich or a giant douche?

 

[RubbinsRacin]

add riverboat Ron ? Yes or si? No?

 

[CantStandYa]

Redacted's second year: 13-17 (4-12), play-in ACCT loss

Stats leaders: McKie, Harris, and to a lesser degree, various combinations of Desrosiers, Chennault, Walker, and Mescheriakov.

It's apples and oranges to try to compare directly, considering how different the ACC is now to just four short years ago. Considering that most of us expect this season to play out to a 2-16, or 3-15 ACC record, you'd be reaching to say that Manning performed equal to (let alone better than) Redacted in Year 2.

The eyeball test seems to say that this year's team has given up - maybe they'll prove that to be wrong.

 

[DCDeac]

Redacted won 21 games in his first two years against joke schedules. Manning has 23. There's no argument here unless people just find it interesting to compare eating shit to drinking urine.

 

[cheeseheads12]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s8U_TjgPq8o

 

[ChrisL68]

Redacted won 21 games in his first two years against joke schedules. Manning has 23. There's no argument here unless people just find it interesting to compare eating shit to drinking urine.

He also didn't have two upperclassmen starters. This season is turning into a disaster of bzdelikian proportions

 

[CantStandYa]

Redacted won 21 games in his first two years against joke schedules. Manning has 23. There's no argument here unless people just find it interesting to compare eating shit to drinking urine.

Saying there's no argument is just silly. It's the internet - we can argue about anything.

Seriously though, if the current course continues, Manning will have fewer wins (overall and ACC) in year 2 than Redacted. That certainly merits a discussion, factoring in the ACC changes, the roster comparisons, etc.