About half of Israel and tons of American Jews totally oppose Bibi. His actions regarding settlements and lying about Iran creates terrorism that doesn't need to exist.
No one is treating Iran as a victim. They have kept their word on the deal.
In fact if you on Page 3, item III is says :
"iii. Iran reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek, develop or acquire any nuclear weapons."
https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/245317.pdf
We watched them dismantle 2/3 of their centrifuge. We watched as they poured cement in their only heavy water tank. We watched as they gave up their enriched uranium and destroy their plutonium devices.
The lies by Bibi are no different than the lies told by W and his cabal to immorally create the Iraq War. The IAEA said there were no WMDs in Iraq. There weren't. The IAEA said there was no nuclear program in Iraq. There wasn't. This is no different. The IAEA says none of what Bibi alleges is true.
The "victims" if Trump's irrationally leaves this agreement will be the United States of America. Iran will have no reason not to immediately go into full production of nuclear weapons. No one in the world will trust the word of the United States for decades. That's why Donald Trump is so dangerous.
Why would Kim Jung Il denuclearize if nothing Trump signs can be trusted? Kim has already suckered Trump into saying stupid shit that give the North Korean leader status in the world.
1. Of course roughly half of Israelis oppose Bibi, free countries with free elections have that luxury. I'll concede that American Jews are generally liberal and will rubber stamp a Democratic ticket, but I need some evidence that shows that tons "totally oppose Bibi."
But explain how a Zionist mission to create the free state of Israel became a terrorist organization. If you can effectively do so, explain to me how a 2 state solution is viable.
2. From your earlier post, "pins and needles" generally means being powerless. For example, Japan is on "pins and needles" right now regarding the Korean peninsula. Japan has no say directly in something that could affect them in every way.
3. Large print, bolded quotes don't make me hate the deal less. I will never believe they dismantled what you believe is 2/3rds of whatever or destroyed whatever because I believe they have a lot more than whatever you saw happen.
Also, there were WMD in Iraq btw, just not what we were really looking for. You also don't have to sell me on the stupidity of the "War on Terror," hated the whole thing from the start. I'll tell you all about it if you're interested.
Nonetheless, the anti-Bibi/Trump rhetoric that you support with some IAEA references appears to suggest the pair want a war with Iran. Are you really suggesting that?
4. I don't want Trump to leave this agreement. I hate this a agreement, but we shouldn't leave it. I do find it ironic that "no one in the world will trust the United States for decades" if we do leave it, as if no world leaders can discern differences between countries like Iraq and North Korea and the West, or that there are no common interests with countries that aren't considered to be part of the West. Why the hell should we trust them? Why not renegotiate the terms? Why presume these leaders are mindless thugs that have no interest in self-preservation and the survival of their people?
5. You obviously mean Un, because Kim's father would never have entertained the idea. Nonetheless, seems like Moon is pro-NK moreso than SK's prior leaders. Park, for example, was not. Park also got caught up in a corruption scandal that suppressed Moon and changed SK's intelligence service to this day.
Nonetheless, Trump means something here, not everything, but certainly something. You talk about how Kim "suckered Trump into saying stupid shit" that gave him "status in the world." Who didn't recognize Kim's status in the world or the status of his family for decades before Trump got elected? Seriously, name the doubters. Have we been sanctioning ghosts?
