To clarify, you're suggesting that FSU has a better chance of winning at Clemson than Wake does? The team that Wake beat by 21 (could/should have been worse) is better suited to win at Clemson because...?
With the way our defense played that game we would’ve won with Wolford I think. He was unreal that year.
IIRC, Wolford got banged up against FSU the week before and it was the type of injury where he maybe would have played against a different opponent, but there was no sense in rolling him out in a game where we'd likely get steamrolled and he would take a ton of punishment.
Which is to say I think we pretty much knew he wasn't going to play, but didn't know for sure until the first team offense actually took the field.
Clemson nepotism is gonna keep killing them. Lots disention on their team.
And Dabo kid. And another d coach kid. And they all playing it wrong.Is this a reference to Venables kids' playing time?
The problem for Clemson is the locker room doesn't think their coaches kids deserve their minutes. Pretty sure Childress was not seen that way. It's not the scholarship. Staff is entirely different, though I wouldnt allow it.Wasn't Brandon Childress on scholarship? Wasn't Manning's kid on his staff? Isn't Forbes' kid on his staff?
Glass houses, folks.
Wasn't Brandon Childress on scholarship? Wasn't Manning's kid on his staff? Isn't Forbes' kid on his staff?
Glass houses, folks.
Because FSU is playing better and our D has reverted back to a typical Clawson D with the loss of 2-3 major contributing starters.
No way Syracuse should have gotten the yardage on us they did.
I'm always concerned about every opponent. Army upset us with Skinner throwing 3 INTs, IIRC. Duke has spoiled a season or beat us when underdogs. UNC's O loves our D. Just hoping we find a way to win and Clemson losses at least 2 ACC games, so a loss to them won't prevent a division title, ala 2006.