BobStackFan4Life
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 31,661
- Reaction score
- 1,538
Based on footage from abroad, refugees seem to take a more aggressive approach to the local populace.
LOL!
Based on footage from abroad, refugees seem to take a more aggressive approach to the local populace.
Based on footage from abroad, refugees seem to take a more aggressive approach to the local populace. Whether those are rarities or commonalities is the question.
Let me help: Neither you, I nor even Numbers (not yet, anyway) is the President. What we, in our nonceremonial capacities, think and say does not speak for the national policy of this Country. We should be able to call this shit for the garbage it is, without having to lump in Buddhists, the Amish and left-handed Presbyterians. This is a primarily Islam problem. You are brave enough to agree. ITC can't distinguish between hearing a Christian prayer at a graduation and the Boston Bombers targeting a child cheering on his father. That's the shit that we, as presumably thinking people, need to knock off.
The President has to walk a finer line, but he's running from it. We don't get the "If one of my children was flying internationally, they'd look like the blood-covered toddler in that airport" speech. We save that one for the permissible bad guy. There is a space between "Bomb until they convert to not crazy" and "Meh? Whadyagonnado?" He's forfeited that leadership opportunity.
That's the reason I posted 2 links. Of the 10,000 stated, nearly half are non-assault accidents. That's a 9/11 attack's worth of injuries and deaths every single year. President Obama has attempted numerous times to create or encourage legislation to prevent malfeasant gun ownership, but he's been blocked at every attempt by conservatives "protecting the 2nd amendment". It's hypocritical bullshit for the same people to ignore violence and death here domestically and instead pursue a religious war abroad, based on a much smaller threat.
"Mentally ill" ? How about lazy? Foolish, or naive? Paranoid? Criminal? Mental illness is not the problem, people have been mentally ill since the dawn of time, the problem is guns, and the American love of gun culture.Okay, I didn't read the second link and to be honest it's not an issue I follow closely. I do wish there was a more effective way to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill though.
HahahahahahahahahaThis thread is a good example of the usual strawman accusers changing the direction of this thread because they don't want to face the tough reality of islamic terrorism and the support it receives from the silent majority of the muslim world. Lets all talk about gun deaths instead because we don't have any threads for that. Can't have multiple issues they all have to be connected.
Okay, I didn't read the second link and to be honest it's not an issue I follow closely. I do wish there was a more effective way to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill though.
"Mentally ill" ? How about lazy? Foolish, or naive? Paranoid? Criminal? Mental illness is not the problem, people have been mentally ill since the dawn of time, the problem is guns, and the American love of gun culture.
if only there was some sort of pre-buying process we could put into place
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/12204593/We-must-stop-blaming-ourselves-for-Islamist-terrorism.htmlThe problem of Islamic extremism is caused – astonishingly enough – by Islamic extremism. As France, Belgium and many other societies can now attest, the larger your Muslim population, the larger your Islamic extremism problem. Not because most Muslims are terrorists. Obviously not. But because that “small minority” we always hear about grows proportionally bigger the larger the community is. What matters is the numbers, the density (thus their ability to hide and be hidden) and the type of Islam that is followed. Given Europe’s current demographic trajectory this poses a pretty terrifying problem which we’ll have to face up to one day. But in the meantime it remains so much more comfortable to blame the only people we’re kidding. Ourselves.
Good article. Self flagellation is such an important part of the left-liberal narrative that they are lost without it. Therefore, they cling to it like some security blanket in order to avoid facing facts that might contradict their misconceptions of the world.
It's a fair point but I think, personally, that it's a weak one. What is the source of discomfort for you if a trans-man walks into the bathroom and uses a stall while you're at the urinal?