ImTheCaptain
I disagree with you
We are going to start investigating people to find a crime now? Seems like a smart trajectory for law enforcement. Don’t see how that could go wrong in the future.
republicans have lost their minds
We are going to start investigating people to find a crime now? Seems like a smart trajectory for law enforcement. Don’t see how that could go wrong in the future.
republicans have lost their minds
republicans have lost their minds
I wish they cared as much about actual injustice in our criminal justice system. They’re losing their minds because there was an investigation based on plenty of evidence that resulted in numerous indictments and jail time for several people.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/us/politics/senate-criminal-justice-bill.html
Meanwhile, the Mueller Investigation yielded an inversion in the burden of proof by stating that it couldn’t be proven that Trump didn’t commit a crime. Is that the standard we should apply to the accused? Trump signed the biggest criminal reform bill in ten years. Even Van Jones applauded. Perhaps you should read more and post less.
republicans have lost their minds
Haha. I barely even post here anymore because the left has collective Trump derangement. So much so though it is the left that is suggesting we start investigating people to find out if they did something. That’s crazy.
Ya’ll have lost it. I just lurk for the occasional laugh.
The standards for a crime aren’t the same as the standards for impeachment or not voting for a president to get re-elected.
Either way, Trump would be indicted if he wasn’t president.
I hate to say I told ya so about Wrangor, guys.
Ya...this ain't it, chief.
"First of all, Mueller directly refuted your last statement. He said that despite the ruling that the president can’t technically obstruct, if the evidence was there, they would disregard that ruling and pursue obstruction anyway."
Pretty sure that's incorrect. If I remember correctly, Mueller said that due to DOJ regulations that state the sitting president can't be indicted it wouldn't be fair to charge a president who would have no forum in which to defend himself against the charges.
Thank goodness we have you around Shoo.