- Joined
- Mar 25, 2011
- Messages
- 23,321
- Reaction score
- 6,443
Had a friend ask a great question today...what do we think about tax exempt organizations taking political stances?
Had a friend ask a great question today...what do we think about tax exempt organizations taking political stances?
Had a friend ask a great question today...what do we think about tax exempt organizations taking political stances?
Had a friend ask a great question today...what do we think about tax exempt organizations taking political stances?
Had a friend ask a great question today...what do we think about tax exempt organizations taking political stances?
Ask Planned Parenthood.
Had a friend ask a great question today...what do we think about tax exempt organizations taking political stances?
Had a friend ask a great question today...what do we think about tax exempt organizations taking political stances?
Oh wait, he's Sue Myrick's son. Nevermind !
For the "NCAA is corrupt and has more important problems on which they should focus" crowd, what's the company line for the ACC's decision?
Just reading this thread but
(1) The city of Charlotte did something right, taking a stand for basic human rights, and now all this shit is their fault? That's the load of crap.
(2) It sucks for all of us sports fans that these things are happening but we can't be selfish. The more fallout the better as I see it at this point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since when was it a 'basic human right' for a person with a penis to have access to bathrooms and changing facilities set aside for women? And vice versa? I get the whole discrimination thing - state and federal laws should be updated to include gender identity in the list of classes against which you can't discriminate for employment, housing, etc. - including in NC. That is where the discussion and the focus should be - fixing those discrimination laws in lots of places - not on the bathrooms.
How many states where the NCAA has championships do not include gender identity in their anti-discrimination statutes? I don't know the answer but I would bet it is greater than zero.
No, a gender restrictive sporting body is taking a principled stand and not grandstanding
Complete lack of logic? Bathrooms were called 'mens' and 'woman' in lieu of "penis" and "vagina". The facilities are practical. They aren't some sort of "man cave" and "princess palace". Since that's the case, how is it illogical to expect all penises to go to one and all vaginas to go to the other? No one is being denied a bathroom. No one is being denied the specific facilities inside the bathroom that they'd use in the OTHER bathroom. If nothing is being denied, where is the discrimination? That illogical? One argument I've heard is that it shouldn't matter where people go to the bathroom. The very argument people put out that it's discrimination is that it matters for one group. Seems hypocritical to me. Again, illogical?Everyone realizes that there are legitimate and obvious reasons for maintaining sex/gender segregation in sports, in contrast to the complete lack of logic underlying the rationalizations for HB2 right?
Since when was it a 'basic human right' for a person with a penis to have access to bathrooms and changing facilities set aside for women? And vice versa? I get the whole discrimination thing - state and federal laws should be updated to include gender identity in the list of classes against which you can't discriminate for employment, housing, etc. - including in NC. That is where the discussion and the focus should be - fixing those discrimination laws in lots of places - not on the bathrooms.
How many states where the NCAA has championships do not include gender identity in their anti-discrimination statutes? I don't know the answer but I would bet it is greater than zero.