• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

income inequality debate

this is a really good article about the decline of the middle class. Recommended reading. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/a-middle-class-strongholds-uncertain-future/489356/

The more I read about these issues, the more convinced I become that something structural has to change in our economy. "Retraining" workers for non-existent jobs is not going to get the job done. I'm not sure what the answer is, but we've got to do something or we're not going to have a middle class anymore.

Worth noting that the job of building some housing units and stacking them on top of other housing units is 1) something blue collar workers can do but is 2) currently illegal in many places that could actually use more and cheaper housing units.
 
this is a really good article about the decline of the middle class. Recommended reading. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/a-middle-class-strongholds-uncertain-future/489356/

The more I read about these issues, the more convinced I become that something structural has to change in our economy. "Retraining" workers for non-existent jobs is not going to get the job done. I'm not sure what the answer is, but we've got to do something or we're not going to have a middle class anymore.

The fact that the old jobs aren't coming back does not mean that we can't have new jobs. One of the things I was looking forward to in the current administration was growth in the green energy sector and infrastructure improvements. We can certainly do more in both areas than we are doing.
 
The fact that the old jobs aren't coming back does not mean that we can't have new jobs. One of the things I was looking forward to in the current administration was growth in the green energy sector and infrastructure improvements. We can certainly do more in both areas than we are doing.

Pretty much impossible with the Rs/tea party in congress.
 
You can't be this narrow minded.

My bad. Government throwing tons of money to preferred start up industries usually works great. This was just the exception.

The free market can't handle stuff like this. Need the vision of the US government to show the way.
 
Gets simplistic right wing talking points that appeals to tea party yahoos?

Having a balanced budget amendment would literally be one of the worst ideas ever.

My RW masters have brainwashed me. It's not my fault.
 
My bad. Government throwing tons of money to preferred start up industries usually works great. This was just the exception.

The free market can't handle stuff like this. Need the vision of the US government to show the way.

You don't know your American history, friend.
 
Can't be disappointed if you don't expect much to begin with. Thanks, teach.

Put down ayn rand and read. This was a 10 second Google search. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-lazonick/nine-government-investmen_b_954185.html


Railroads:

Under the Pacific Railroad Acts of 1862 through 1866, the U.S. government handed railroad companies 103 million acres of public land that could be sold or used as loan collateral to finance the construction of transcontinental railroad lines. These land grants were equivalent to 5.34 percent of the size of the continental United States and greater than the size of California.

Universities: Under the Morrill Land-Grant Act of 1862, the U.S. government gifted every state in the nation 30,000 acres of land as an endowment for an institution of higher education for the “agricultural and mechanical arts.” Besides many eponymous state universities, Cornell, MIT, Purdue, and Rutgers all originated as land-grant colleges. The Morrill Act of 1890 provided each state with annual federal financial support for the colleges. By the early 20th century, the success of “mechanical arts” education within this public system compelled elite private universities such as Harvard and Yale to launch engineering courses and degrees.

Agriculture: The Hatch Act of 1887 provided federal funding for agricultural experiment stations, most of them set up in proximity to land-grant colleges, to engage in state-of-the-art research that could increase the productivity of the nation’s farms. The Smith-Lever Act of 1914 funded cooperative extension services, including the employment of thousands of “county agents,” to diffuse the latest knowledge to farmers.

Aircraft: In the 1920s, the U.S. government played the leading role in not only supporting aeronautics research but also promoting air mail services. Under the Contract Air Mail Act of 1925, the U.S. Postmaster General gave subsidized air mail contracts to a select number of commercial airline companies to encourage the airlines to demand safer, quieter, and larger planes from aircraft manufacturers so that passenger travel would increase. Five years later, when little progress in the development of passenger-friendly aircraft had been made, the Air Mail Act of 1930 changed the subsidy from the amount of mail carried on a plane to the size of the plane in which mail was carried, even if the plane carried only one letter. This generous government incentive scheme worked: By 1933, plane manufacturers Boeing and Douglas had each developed the modern all-metal, two-engine monoplane for the airlines, and air travel for people took off.

Jet engines: The turbojet engine, invented in Britain in the mid-1930s by Royal Air Force officer Frank Whittle, was given to the U.S company General Electric (GE) in 1942 to develop for use in World War II. GE was not in the aviation business, but, as the leading producer of electric power equipment, had been doing gas-turbine research since 1903. The jet engine was not put into service during World War II, but after the war GE continued to develop it for the U.S. military and also shared the technology with Pratt & Whitney, the leading producer of commercial airplane engines. In 1974, GE entered the commercial jet engine business through a joint venture, CFM International, with SNECMA, a French state-owned company, to provide engines to midsized Airbus planes. GE is now the world’s leading producer of commercial jet engines.

College-educated labor force: While the land-grant college acts created a national system of higher education in the late 19th century, it was only in the aftermath of World War II that a large proportion of the population gained ready access to it. In 1944, Congress passed the Serviceman’s Readjustment Act, popularly known as the G.I. Bill of Rights, which provided funding to U.S. veterans of World War II to obtain college educations, buy homes, and start businesses. By the time the initial program ended in 1956, almost 50 percent of the 16 million veterans of World War II had received education and training benefits under the G. I. Bill.

Interstate highway system: Under the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, the government committed to pay for 90 percent of the cost of building 41,000 miles of interstate highways. President Eisenhower justified this expenditure on the grounds that the highways were needed to defend the United States in case of a military attack on U.S. soil. Whatever the rationale for this investment, the system has provided businesses and households with a fundamental physical infrastructure for civilian purposes.

Computers and the Internet: A 1999 study, “Funding a Revolution: Government Support of for Computing Research,” stated, “Federal funding not only financed development of most of the nation’s early digital computers, but also has continued to enable breakthroughs in areas as wide ranging as computer time-sharing, the Internet, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality as the industry has matured.” Among other things, the study details the now well-known role of the U.S. government in developing the ARPANET and the NSFNET for over three decades before it became available commercially as the Internet.

Life sciences: The 2010 budget of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for life sciences research was30.9 billion, almost double in real terms the budget of 1993 and triple in real terms the budget of 1985. From the founding of the first national institute in 1938 through 2010, NIH spending totaled738 billion in 2010 dollars. The 2011 budget is30.9 billion, and the request for 2012 is32 billion. In addition, federal and state governments provide many subsidies to the medical field. For example, the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 has been critical to the development of the biopharmaceutical industry.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top