cville deac
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2011
- Messages
- 15,268
- Reaction score
- 915
Hopefully step #1 was listed as "get a better coach."
Yeah, I think it's:
Step 1: Fire Bz
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Profit
Hopefully step #1 was listed as "get a better coach."
One of the big things is I am overwhelmingly left-handed. You'll notice I make a lot of the same mistakes.
I'm kinda surprised that multiple people think that fewer people on these boards have HBO than have ESPN Insider.
I'd put an honest poll of people on these boards at 2-1 for HBO or better. I wouldn't be stunned if that number was 5-1.
Also, i thought the title was "wake's path back to the top." There wasn't any semblance of a suggested path. I was excited to read it until i realized it was just a recount of how bad it actually was last year.
Wait did the same mods who started this board to fight censorship just censor this thread?
really?
One of the big things is I am overwhelmingly left-handed. You'll notice I make a lot of the same mistakes.
Also I was OLD when the internet really hit in the mid-90s and had assistants/secretaries doing my typing until then.
People can say what they want. That was a premium article that is copyrighted.
I wouldn't call that censorship myself.
We've gotten complaints about having private articles posted here already in our short existence. We don't need some stupid legal issue causing problems for the site.
Someone can summarize/bullet point the article if they'd like. It's nothing we don't already know.
We've gotten complaints about having private articles posted here already in our short existence. We don't need some stupid legal issue causing problems for the site.
Someone can summarize/bullet point the article if they'd like. It's nothing we don't already know.
Brendan's the guy who watched the BCS Championship game on his laptop and called on us to join in his ESPN boycott. He's not worth taking seriously.
We've gotten complaints about having private articles posted here already in our short existence. We don't need some stupid legal issue causing problems for the site.
Someone can summarize/bullet point the article if they'd like. It's nothing we don't already know.
We all know there are certain posters from the forgotten land who actually have nothing better to do than to notify espn whenever this site breaks a copyright. Deleting copied articles is not censorship.
That being said, there's no way they will ever successfully sue a site for embedding a youtube video that had copyrighted content in it. That's just a fear-mongering article meant to stir up some outrage over moronic legislation.