• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

KP Report on the Virginia Tech Hokies -- Wednesday 7 pm RSN/ESPN 3

Pilchard

Well-known member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
17,604
Reaction score
6,826
Tomorrow night our fearless Deacons take on VT at the Joel. Here is the breakdown:

Record: The Hokies are 12-4 (1-2) and #50 in KP's ratings. Top 100 wins: #89 Iowa by 24,#86 Ole Miss in OT; top 100 losses: at #22 Kentucky by 7, at #49 Cuse by 12, home versus UVA by 26 (Tech also lost to a terrible St. Louis team). VT has played 3 true road games and they are 1-2 (the OT win at Ole Miss).

Offense: The Hokie offense is rated #42 in offensive efficiency. Their effective FG % is an a ridiculous 60% (#3) as they shoot 59.7% from 2 and 40.1% from 3. That said, VT was leading the nation in that stat by a good margin when ACC play started, and their offense has struggled in ACC games: in ACC games VT has an effective FG% of 47% (#11 in the conference) and they are shooting only 24.6% from 3 (#14 out 15 in conference -- btw, WF leads the conference in 3 PT % in ACC games - 43.2%). Tech also gets to the line often (#8 in FTA/FGA). They also like to push tempo on offense their average possession length on offense is 14.8 seconds (#10 in the country). VT does not hit the offensive boards hard (#274).

Defense: The Tech defense is rated #81 in defensive efficiency. VT mixes up their defenses, and they are decent in most defensive categories except they don't force turnovers and don't block shots. They defend the 2 (47% #93) and the 3 (32% #60) reasonably well, but again, those numbers drop off in ACC play as VT is second to last in conference games in effective FG% (57%) and 3 PT FG% (44%), despite playing teams that aren't great offensively -- Cuse, UVA and Pitt).

Roster: VT starts: 6-1 (Robinson), 6-5 (Hill), 6-5 (Bibbs), 6-6 (Clarke or Alexander-Walker), 6-10 Blackshear. VT plays a 7 or 8 man rotation, but Bibbs, Robinson and Blackshear have all played 35 plus minutes in one or more ACC games. VT is balanced as five players average double digits and a sixth (Clarke) averages 8 ppg. 2 Guard Ahmed Hill is shooting 49% from 3, while Robinson shoots 38%, Alexander-Walker 41% and even the Hokie center, Blackshear, can hit the 3 (50% on 7 of 14 shooting). Blackshear scored a career high 31 in Saturday's win over Pitt, but Pitt's starting center was out. Zach LeDay, who killed WF last year, including 31 against WF in the ACC tournament, has graduated (thank god).

Bottom Line: VT dominated an easy schedule early this year, but they have struggled in ACC play with double digit losses to Cuse and UVA, and they even struggled for most of the way against Pitt. VT likes to run, and ACC teams have stopped the Hokie transition game which has caused the VT offense to bog down in half court (UVA just dissected VT). VT scored 90+ 7 times in its first 10 games, but has averaged only 63 in ACC play. KP projects an 81-80 WF win, and WF needs this one as its next 7 games are brutal (@Duke, @ State, UVA, Duke, @ L'ville, FSU, Clemson @ Miami). Think/hope WF will pull out a win.
 
Last edited:
We'll win this one 86-80. We will have 10-12 turnovers and make 75%-80% of our free throws to ice the game.

Look for Chaundee to continue to improve and make a difference in this one too. Doral should have 12-7 type game.

I've nailed our last 2 conference games and am going to nail this one too.

GO DEACS
 
Last edited:
Let's get this home win Deacs!

We definitely do need it staring down the barrel of @ Duke, @ State, UVA, Duke, @ L'ville, FSU, Clemson @ Miami.... :eek:
 
Thinking we either:

1) Win this one and look good, then get smoked @ Duke

or

2) Lose this one and look terrible, then look good @ Duke (and still lose)

Scenario 1 seems more likely. Go Deacs!
 
after looking at our ACC road record under Manning (3-26) and in fact since Paul left (12-85)...we need to win the winnable home games
 
Is Key questionable or is it understood already that he will not be playing?
 
The Key to understanding is the number 2. Because that is how many games he was supposed to miss. Now you can count the game in which he got injured or not count it. How you count is the Key to knowing what two games is.
 
We better win this one, or we could be staring down the barrel of 1-8 before you could say, "Fuck you, Jeff [name redacted]."
 
Last edited:
Simple formula for a win. Shoot 50% or better from the field. Play defense well enough to hold VPI under 70 points. Deacs undefeated when they achieve either standard. Do both, get a W.
 
I'm prepared for another lackluster performance, and embarrassing home loss. I think (my opinion) that we need an on court leader who can rally the team together, stay positive, and make sure everyone on the court is involved. We have too many heroes on the team right now. Who would everyone say is the leader of this team? Crawford? Woods? Wilbekin? My HS coach told us that he was looking for 4 players than can play with this one kid... hearing this kinda sucked at the moment, but at least we knew who the leader of the team was. If the kids can't figure out who the leader is, maybe DM should tell them who it is? Maybe kids of today can't take being told what to do, anymore? Fragile egos? Solely based on body language, it's like our guys would just assume trip a teammate on the way to the bench, instead of a high-five, and a atta boy on the back!
 
Given where both teams are, losing to Virginia Tech at home would not be "embarrassing", especially without our second-leading scorer.

It's a toss-up game in Vegas.

If you mean "embarrassing" as an indicator of where the program is, then fine, that's an opinion, but losing this game would be far from "embarrassing" given the reality of the situations for both teams right now.
 
Given where both teams are, losing to Virginia Tech at home would not be "embarrassing", especially without our second-leading scorer.

It's a toss-up game in Vegas.

If you mean "embarrassing" as an indicator of where the program is, then fine, that's an opinion, but losing this game would be far from "embarrassing" given the reality of the situations for both teams right now.

It would be embarrassing. Too many of us have just grown used to the embarrassment to the point that it is no longer noticeable.
 
Probably no Key tonight, so I expect Crawford to take a lot of shots and for people here to be quite pissy about it
 
Back
Top