and Bernie Panders agrees
bring back Al Bore!
...Many Germans will, like Der Spiegel, claim the renewables transition was merely “botched,” but it wasn't. The transition to renewables was doomed because modern industrial people, no matter how Romantic they are, do not want to return to pre-modern life...
So you are advocating that others follow Germany's expensive, wasteful, and unproductive path?
Renewable or nothing is a false dichotomy.
New study reported in paper says we can remove 2/3 of current man made CO2 from atmosphere by planting trees, could be more cost effective than the CO2 removing machines that are currently being developed. Study says there is sufficient open land around the earth to allow sufficient planting, need about 1000000 acres to effect changes. Funny, this was somewhat speculated when I was taking an ecology course at WFU 45 years ago.
New study reported in paper says we can remove 2/3 of current man made CO2 from atmosphere by planting trees, could be more cost effective than the CO2 removing machines that are currently being developed. Study says there is sufficient open land around the earth to allow sufficient planting, need about 1000000 acres to effect changes. Funny, this was somewhat speculated when I was taking an ecology course at WFU 45 years ago.
So you are advocating that others follow Germany's expensive, wasteful, and unproductive path?
Renewable or nothing is a false dichotomy.
A TRILLION trees...that's a BILLION trees per year for 1000 years.
Currently, there are THREE trillion trees on the Earth. Where would the land come from to add 1/3 for this to happen?
By the way you and others have dishonestly forgotten to include the following:
"The study in the journal Science, first reported by The Associated Press, found that planting trees could be the most effective way to remove carbon from the atmosphere, but cautioned that it would have little effect without a reduction of emissions around the globe."
If we can't do it, we should just give up and do none. You'll be dead anyway. So, why should you care about it anyway?
A TRILLION trees...that's a BILLION trees per year for 1000 years.
Currently, there are THREE trillion trees on the Earth. Where would the land come from to add 1/3 for this to happen?
By the way you and others have dishonestly forgotten to include the following:
"The study in the journal Science, first reported by The Associated Press, found that planting trees could be the most effective way to remove carbon from the atmosphere, but cautioned that it would have little effect without a reduction of emissions around the globe."