DeacMan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2011
- Messages
- 9,708
- Reaction score
- 948
and yet their revenue and profit are stronger than they were before the spill. YAY!
Continue, please. This should be a nice segway off the topic yet again.
and yet their revenue and profit are stronger than they were before the spill. YAY!
Continue, please. This should be a nice segway off the topic yet again.
What in the fucking fuck are you talking about? When did you become such a crazy person?
"laws are good," "courts are good," "regulation is good" ... but government is bad
phan is spot on with his assessment of financial regulation
everyone please stay on topic. we're talking about how there are more libertarians. that's the only relevant discussion point.
Passing reasonable regulations would be much easier if not for people in government who believe in your libertarian principles.
Passing reasonable regulations would be much easier if not for people in government who believe in your libertarian principles.
This should be rich. Please, go on and tell us all about financial regulation.
What will we all get out of Dodd-Frank once the government actually gets around to passing regulations for the law? That process, btw, has been a complete cluster fuck to date that makes the roll out of Obamacare look like a model of efficiency and excellence. And my what an outstanding job the current administration has done in moving to aggressively enforce violations of laws that existed before the implementation (if you can call it that) of Dodd-Frank.
The role of regulation is part of the equation. But it's primary role is to help prevent "bad" things from happening in the first place. And that role has value - you won't hear me advocating for an end to much of the regulation we have on the books.