So help me out here. The current argument is that Currie is not following the plan of firing the current head coach, then searching for a new coach, then negotiating with interested coaches.
Instead he’s playing 4D chess and negotiating a buyout with Manning while also negotiating with Beilein, Matta, Forbes, and others. Once he gets this awesome deal, he’s going to make this grant announcement in which he fires Manning and introduces the new coach at the same time.
Is that what people are saying?
It's much more likely that Currie is simply fucking this process up and has no idea how to conduct a firing/hiring. Past performance and all that.
It's much more likely that Currie is simply fucking this process up and has no idea how to conduct a firing/hiring. Past performance and all that.
No matter how many times you bring this up about Currie at TN your position will never be accurate. The debacle at TN was created by Phil Fulmer and his acolytes. They stepped in to ruin every deal. This is what happened.
Danny hasn’t seemed to know much during his tenure here so that follows
So currie may have already fired him but danny does not realize it yet? Makes sense watching him on the sidelines.
So currie may have already fired him but danny does not realize it yet? Makes sense watching him on the sidelines.
I know we live in the age of trump where our leaders never take any responsibility for anything that goes bad, but John Currie was the athletic dinner director at UT and Phil fulmer was not. If Currie got played by fulmer in a power move , whose fault is that. If Currie wanted leach as his coach and fulmer undermined it then then that’s curries fault for getting played like a sucker. Speaking of getting played like a sucker, it appears history is repeating itself all over again and Manning will be back, but in an even weaker position then before ( can you be weaker than DFL? We’re about to find out). If Currie somehow pulls off this 4d chess move and has Matta or Beilen wearing a Black and gold tie at a press conference, then I’ll gladly say I was wrong.
I think that has shaped the management of basketball coaches in the years since then.
i.e. hire unmotivated coaches who don't hate losing and you won't have to worry about them pushing themselves too hard or stressing themselves?
And yet he hired Clawson. Guess it doesn't have to make sense...little does over the last 10 years.That. And not putting much pressure for performance on them.
And yet he hired Clawson. Guess it doesn't have to make sense...little does over the last 10 years.