Pilchard
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 3, 2011
- Messages
- 17,191
- Reaction score
- 6,469
WF plays at Duke's on-campus arena tomorrow. Duke (15-6; 6-4; KP #28) is the most over-covered/over-rated team in the sport, and the team that produces the least given Duke's annual spot on top of the recruiting rankings. Will leave the analysis to the current analytics snapshot and the projections.
Here are the analytics in ACC Games:
Offense:
Efficiency: WF 112.4 (#1) - Duke 108.8 (#4)
TO%: WF 14% (#3) - Duke18.3% (#13)
2 PT FG%: WF 52.3% (#5) - Duke 51% (#7)
3 PT FG%: WF 38.4% (#2) - Duke (33.8%) (#10)
Effective FG%: WF 54.6% (#1) - Duke (50.9% (#10)
Off. Rebounding%: WF 23.9% (#13) - Duke - 35.3% (#1)
Defense:
Efficiency: WF 109.0 (#11) - Duke 102.4 (#5)
TO%: WF 17.5% (#4) - Duke 15.3% (#12)
2 PT FG%: WF 52.5% (#11) - Duke 47.8% (#4)
3 PT FG%: WF 37.4% (#13) - Duke 33% (#6)
Effective FG%: WF 54.1% (#13) - Duke 48.4% (#4)
Off. Rebounding%: WF 25.8% (#6) - Duke 26.9% (#9)
Team (national rankings):
Bench minutes: WF 25.8% (#300 - WF bench participation has been shrinking with each game - sign of desperation) - Duke 33.5% (#118)
Experience: WF 2.53 years (#62) - Duke 1.38 years #291
Height: WF 77.9 (#61) - Duke 79.2 (#2)
Tempo ACC Games: WF 69.5 (#3 - used to be #1 as WF has reduced bench minutes, the Deacs have played a little slower) - Duke 66.7 (#12)
Roster note: Duke's C Dariq Whitehead was injured in last week's loss at VT and he missed the blow-out at GT. Whitehead is not expected back for tomorrow's game.
Projection: KP: Duke 78-69 - Torvik: 77-70 Duke
Quick Comment: After WF beat Clemson to go 14-5 (6-2), the WF bandwagon got chesty, and the Deacs promptly lost 3 straight. Now that the bandwagon hit the bridge abutment (and after Duke's massive beatdown of GT by 40+), the sentiment is that Deacs will get worked tomorrow. Sports are weird. Just when the fanbase announces they are quitting WF, that's when the Deacs play well. So, you never know what may happen on Tuesday.
That said, like many young teams, Duke plays much better at home (10-0; 7-3 ATS). Also, WF has not won at Duke this century. Perhaps the Deacs are due.
Here are the analytics in ACC Games:
Offense:
Efficiency: WF 112.4 (#1) - Duke 108.8 (#4)
TO%: WF 14% (#3) - Duke18.3% (#13)
2 PT FG%: WF 52.3% (#5) - Duke 51% (#7)
3 PT FG%: WF 38.4% (#2) - Duke (33.8%) (#10)
Effective FG%: WF 54.6% (#1) - Duke (50.9% (#10)
Off. Rebounding%: WF 23.9% (#13) - Duke - 35.3% (#1)
Defense:
Efficiency: WF 109.0 (#11) - Duke 102.4 (#5)
TO%: WF 17.5% (#4) - Duke 15.3% (#12)
2 PT FG%: WF 52.5% (#11) - Duke 47.8% (#4)
3 PT FG%: WF 37.4% (#13) - Duke 33% (#6)
Effective FG%: WF 54.1% (#13) - Duke 48.4% (#4)
Off. Rebounding%: WF 25.8% (#6) - Duke 26.9% (#9)
Team (national rankings):
Bench minutes: WF 25.8% (#300 - WF bench participation has been shrinking with each game - sign of desperation) - Duke 33.5% (#118)
Experience: WF 2.53 years (#62) - Duke 1.38 years #291
Height: WF 77.9 (#61) - Duke 79.2 (#2)
Tempo ACC Games: WF 69.5 (#3 - used to be #1 as WF has reduced bench minutes, the Deacs have played a little slower) - Duke 66.7 (#12)
Roster note: Duke's C Dariq Whitehead was injured in last week's loss at VT and he missed the blow-out at GT. Whitehead is not expected back for tomorrow's game.
Projection: KP: Duke 78-69 - Torvik: 77-70 Duke
Quick Comment: After WF beat Clemson to go 14-5 (6-2), the WF bandwagon got chesty, and the Deacs promptly lost 3 straight. Now that the bandwagon hit the bridge abutment (and after Duke's massive beatdown of GT by 40+), the sentiment is that Deacs will get worked tomorrow. Sports are weird. Just when the fanbase announces they are quitting WF, that's when the Deacs play well. So, you never know what may happen on Tuesday.
That said, like many young teams, Duke plays much better at home (10-0; 7-3 ATS). Also, WF has not won at Duke this century. Perhaps the Deacs are due.
Last edited: