• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

New York Times circa 2015..it didn’t matter

L

Lectro

Banhammer'd
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
8,876
Reaction score
254
if they told the truth of Uranium One.Alas,in 2015 it was a sure bet that Lady Clinton would thrash low-ebb Jeb and become our first Madam President. The sordid story of pay-to-play would never become radioactive and instead would have a half-life of maybe 1 or 2 months max.Printing it in 2015 could be framed as a journalistic admission — an example of the Grey Lady’s fastidious standards. In 2015 one imagined that only on some lonely outpost would future academics lurk back into its obscure history.The story would be left to hardened researchers — assuming they’d not become extinct as the central cast of our Uranium play most assuredly would have then become..

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/...ml?_r=3&referer=https://t.co/Vr299EtlMi?amp=1

Ahh,if only the NY Times would display the same courage in 2018.. and print the story when it really counts and not merely as rear-view-window-dressing
 
the reason for the private server was so that Hillary could control her e-mails even after she left office, why did she feel she needed to control them? because she was using her office to solicit contributions for her foundation

the bleach and hammer applied to the evidence is a powerful indication that this is so
 
Last edited:
The dumb and the delusional. How sailor met lectro.
 
sailordeac said:
The further nonsensical opinion of a man who still believes that the over 30,000 bleached and hammered e-mails were just correspondence with wedding caterers and yoga instructors.
Click to expand...

“Probably”
 
First of all it's bleachbit you f****** nitwit. Secondly I know that her and her lawyers went through a comprehensive review of those emails to comply with the subpoena. Other than that I have no idea what was on those 30,000 emails and neither do you. I do know that when they found other emails on Anthony Weiner's computer that they cross referenced them against what Clinton provided and they were exactly the same emails. Continue your Clinton derangement fantasies.
 
sailordeac said:
The further nonsensical opinion of a man who still believes that the over 30,000 bleached and hammered e-mails were just correspondence with wedding caterers and yoga instructors.
Click to expand...

You cannot drag the so called Liberal Progressive to the Truth. They want no part of it as they prefer the delusion of the crowd. This is why they revert to wholly unscientific renderings where they become absorbed in polls and percentages. Take the famous 97% that they gibber and repeat like medieval monks and scream ‘heretic!’ at anyone who’d dare challenge their holy litany. They are the new church and are filled with self righteous virtue peddlers who rise every morning to the audacious challenges of a world in need of perpetual fixing. They are a class of new age priests and priesteses who clamor to outdo the other members of their Order..to day in and day out demonstrate their allegiance to appearances. It is a cult which claims to Love the world by saying “look at me,how good I am”.

Fortunately their sickness and historical periods of this type of illness do not last. Inevitably they run out of targets for their bitter antidotes and turn inward upon themselves. In the end,it is a religion built on remorse and entitled victimization and like the Ancient Greek symbol for remorse it coils into a snake devouring itself in a paroxysmal orgy of loathing self-contempt.
 
Polls and percentages are unscientific but anecdotes about "that time Benny fired off six rounds into the darkness when he heard a noise outside and took out five guys trying to break into the trailer" are gospel.
 
ChrisL68 said:
First of all it's bleachbit you f****** nitwit. Secondly I know that her and her lawyers went through a comprehensive review of those emails to comply with the subpoena. Other than that I have no idea what was on those 30,000 emails and neither do you. I do know that when they found other emails on Anthony Weiner's computer that they cross referenced them against what Clinton provided and they were exactly the same emails. Continue your Clinton derangement fantasies.
Click to expand...

yep, this is believable because Hillary has such a stalwart record of trustworthiness

hallucinate all you want, you will not be able to convince people that Hillary is honest, or was honest about her e-mails
 
It’s amazing how the unknown about 30,000 emails is more important than what we actually know about Trump.
 
Wakeforest22890 said:
Polls and percentages are unscientific but anecdotes about "that time Benny fired off six rounds into the darkness when he heard a noise outside and took out five guys trying to break into the trailer" are gospel.
Click to expand...

Spoken like a true so called Left-Liberal Progressive Lefty McLefterstein !
 
It takes a special order of Assinine to be able to stare at the mountain of data..the sheer volume of evidence demonstrating the corruption of the Democratic Party and then shrug 🤷‍♀️ and say “meh”.

But Democrat Assholes are a unique type of Asshole in that they revel in being Assholes. This type of cynical Asshole enjoys the role of the cynical Asshole..as a matter of course they know no other way to be..the only time they become indignant is when others have the audacity to point out for them just what an Asshole they’ve become. You see, the Democrat Asshole is the only one privileged to call him or herself a “Cynical Asshole” as it is their divine right of Assholery.
 
sailordeac said:
yep, this is believable because Hillary has such a stalwart record of trustworthiness

hallucinate all you want, you will not be able to convince people that Hillary is honest, or was honest about her e-mails
Click to expand...

They “probably” all just committed malpractice right? All those lawyers “probably” put their multi million dollar careers on the line.
 
sailordeac said:
yep, this is believable because Hillary has such a stalwart record of trustworthiness

hallucinate all you want, you will not be able to convince people that Hillary is honest, or was honest about her e-mails
Click to expand...
Yes we know you have no evidence and you just make up things though feed your Clinton derangement syndrome but you didn't have to tell us that.
 
Lectro is one of those dudes you look back at after he snaps and say "the signs were all there."

Manifesto? Check.
Conspiracy Theories? Check.
Tendencies to threaten others? Check.
 
Lectro said:
It takes a special order of Assinine to be able to stare at the mountain of data..the sheer volume of evidence demonstrating the corruption of the Democratic Party and then shrug 🤷‍♀️ and say “meh”.

But Democrat Assholes are a unique type of Asshole in that they revel in being Assholes. This type of cynical Asshole enjoys the role of the cynical Asshole..as a matter of course they know no other way to be..the only time they become indignant is when others have the audacity to point out for them just what an Asshole they’ve become. You see, the Democrat Asshole is the only one privileged to call him or herself a “Cynical Asshole” as it is their divine right of Assholery.
Click to expand...

well, ya gotta admit, the lubes are pretty good at assholery
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top