Maybe it's Wake but somewhere has a policy that freshmen don't do media. I like that general philosophy.
At what point does being a Boomer change you? May I die before this age.Always a good thing to turn down positive press from a national writer.
No problem with Nick's declining to speak, but it would seem odd for the SID to not at least refer Feinstein's request to Clawson.
Now, if the SID said "Hey Dave is going to address this in detail on the coach's show, if that doesn't cover what you need let me know" that's one thing. But if he said "No you can't talk to Dave - just listen to the show" then that's a big fail on Wake's part.
And FWIW Feinstein has given Wake plenty of good publicity through years - certainly much more good than bad.
Some of y'all bitch when we don't get coverage - then bitch when people want to cover us but can't.
I like how Nick Anderson had his chance to celebrate on Saturday and Sunday and now wants to move forward and focus on the future...getting ready to beat Syracuse.
What’s a SID
Feinstein comes off as a huge defensive douche, but this does seem like a missed opportunity for Wake and for Nick. Love it or hate it, the Washington Post is a top 3 newspaper in this country, and it would have been good exposure for the program.
Taking 15 minutes out of your day to answer a couple of softball questions doesn’t seem like that much to ask.
Feinstein comes off as a huge defensive douche, but this does seem like a missed opportunity for Wake and for Nick. Love it or hate it, the Washington Post is a top 3 newspaper in this country, and it would have been good exposure for the program.
Taking 15 minutes out of your day to answer a couple of softball questions doesn’t seem like that much to ask.
Feinstein has given Wake good publicity over the years. I’m confused why Clawson wouldn’t want to be involved in a positive fluff piece about a player and the program by a well known and respected sports writer who has been around a long time that will run nationally..