• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Obama Proposes One Weird Trick For Better Markets

TuffaloDeac10

🌹☭
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
13,517
Reaction score
487
Location
Hacker-Festzelt
A couple posters here should be pretty excited about this proposal.

This kind of exponential growth confirms what every New Yorker and cab riders in many other cities have long suspected: Taxi service is woefully inefficient. It also raises a question of broader relevance: Why stop here?...

Like taxi medallions, state licenses required to practice all sorts of jobs often serve merely to cordon off occupations for the benefit of licensed workers and their lobbying groups, protecting them from legitimate competition.

This comes at a substantial social cost. “Lower-income people suffer from licensing,” Professor Krueger told me. “It raises the costs of many services and prevents low-income people from getting into some professions...

The trend worries the Obama administration. The president’s budget, to be unveiled on Monday, will include $15 million for states to analyze the costs and benefits of their licensing rules, identify best practices and explore making licenses portable across state lines...

Locksmiths must be licensed in only 13 [states], upholsterers and dental assistants in seven and shampooers in only five. Iowa requires 490 days of education and training to become a licensed cosmetologist; New York requires 233.

Among the tangle of regulations, it is not hard to find rules that defy common sense. An athletic trainer must put in 1,460 days of training to get a license in Michigan. An emergency medical technician needs only 26.”

Wonder what'll happen with it. Part of me thinks this is a good issue for a Left-Libertarian coalition to accomplish something but I'm pretty pessimistic about its chances.
 
Active duck doing work. Even if none of it passes.
 
Is this a response to Uber crushing the taxi industry?
 
Several things. See the list in 923's link. I'm sure Uber is lobbying right now to make it harder for the next Uber. They already don't want independent drivers.
 
Several things. See the list in 923's link. I'm sure Uber is lobbying right now to make it harder for the next Uber. They already don't want independent drivers.

I was going to ask if food trucks we part of this, and I'm glad to see they are.

Seems like a solid proposal.
 
Is there some monolithic hair braiding lobby that has been suppressing competition?

not exactly. in most states where this is an issue, there is a cosmetology or barbering board that takes the position that hair braiding = cosmetology and wants to force people to go to barber/cosmetology school to braid hair.

For example, here are the NC rules - 300 hours of school plus continuing ed requirements.
House Bill 1133 was signed by the Governor on August 11, 2014 which removed the exam requirement for any natural hair care specialist who was practicing the art of natural hair care prior to July 1, 2010. Applicants eligible for natural hair care specialist licensure must apply prior to July 1, 2015.
(To Apply click here: Natural Hair Care License Application)
After July 1, 2015 any unlicensed individual must graduate from a licensed Cosmetic Arts natural hair care school, pass examination and pay for licensure.

The scope of practice for a natural hair care specialist is different forms of braiding, corn rows, locks, knots, twist and a track and sew method for a weft hair.
To be eligible for licensure you must have been practicing the services mentioned above PRIOR to July 1, 2010, any natural hair care specialist not practicing prior to July 1, 2010 must go to school for 300 hours prior to taking the examination.
When you file your application online you will be asked to affirm under penalty of law that you were actively engaged in the practice of natural hair care prior to July 1, 2010 then you will be asked to submit the fee of $20.00.
A cosmetic art shop that practices natural hair care only and that submits proof to the Board that the shop was actively engaged in the practice of natural hair care on or prior to July 1, 2010 will have until July 1, 2015 to comply with the requirements of G.S. 88B-14.


There is an interesting racial aspect to this as well since hair braiding is nearly exclusively something done by black people to black people, while the cosmetology boards are often, shall we say, less than fully representative of minorities.
 
I wonder hiow much lobbying is done by companies that own cosmetology schools. Those cases have some states with requirements of 1,500+ hours of training. That's good money for someone. (Looking at you, Aveda.)
 
I wonder hiow much lobbying is done by companies that own cosmetology schools. Those cases have some states with requirements of 1,500+ hours of training. That's good money for someone. (Looking at you, Aveda.)

don't forget all that edumacation is being paid for by taxpayer-subsidized student loans, too.
 
It's like a giant middle finger to conservatives who think they own those issues. No chance they let anything with his name on it be passed. Can't have a democrat getting credit for those ideas.
 
not exactly. in most states where this is an issue, there is a cosmetology or barbering board that takes the position that hair braiding = cosmetology and wants to force people to go to barber/cosmetology school to braid hair.

For example, here are the NC rules - 300 hours of school plus continuing ed requirements.



There is an interesting racial aspect to this as well since hair braiding is nearly exclusively something done by black people to black people, while the cosmetology boards are often, shall we say, less than fully representative of minorities.

Yep. It's a way to get a cut out of black businesses servicing black communities.

It's like a giant middle finger to conservatives who think they own those issues. No chance they let anything with his name on it be passed. Can't have a democrat getting credit for those ideas.

Yep. No doubt the conservative response will be that it's a way to take power away from the states and pave the way for national regulations.

The thing is as state legislatures get more and more conservative and the House remains conservative for the foreseeable future, it's good politics for Dems to push to end state regulations that affect small businesses in the modest income range like barbers and hair-braiders.

If there is any area where the free market should reign supreme it's people who do hair. Potential customers see the results of someone's work and word of mouth is very powerful. The risks of a bad haircut/style are relatively inexpensive, low, and temporary compared to more deregulated areas like financial services.
 
Everything should require a government permit of some kind. We, as a society, can't let people run around loose didling with one another's hair or nails.
 
Back
Top