bigdoublezero
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 9,512
- Reaction score
- 678
Not sure how it would best be implemented. How often do they reframe Social Security and indexed items in the tax code?
In the '60s and '70s, the minimum wage was anywhere between $8 and $10 an hour in real dollars. Since then the minimum wage has pingponged between $5.50 and $7.50 an hour, generally trending downward.
The wealth inequality in this country is so absurd, and frankly unsustainable, that it makes a lot of sense to pick a number somewhere between $7.50 and $10 (hopefully closer to the higher of the two), peg it to inflation, and move on. The way things are now, left to its own devices, there's zero evidence that wages will rise respective to gains made by the economy at large.
Not sure how it would best be implemented. How often do they reframe Social Security and indexed items in the tax code?
Not sure how it would best be implemented. How often do they reframe Social Security and indexed items in the tax code?
If you peg minimum wage (an artificial creation) to inflation, then you will just drive up inflation at a faster rate. That doesn't get you anywhere.
LOL. Ask anyone who gets drilled by the AMT every year how often these things get looked at once they are on the books. Hell, Crummey withdrawal power limits were set when the annual gift exclusion was $5,000; the annual gift exclusion is now $14,000 and the withdrawal powers are still capped at $5,000 because nobody can bother to do the simple update - and that is a hard dollar amount, not even a percentage that has to be calculated.
Haven't dealt with the AMT yet have you?
If you peg minimum wage (an artificial creation) to inflation, then you will just drive up inflation at a faster rate. That doesn't get you anywhere.
So just to be clear using executive orders to circumvent a congress that doesn't agree with you is okay now? I must have missed that press release in January 2009.
The only reason it is being done this way is the GOP has steadfastly blocked incremental increases. The reality is $10.10 is at or below where the minimum wage would be if it were simply tied to inflation over the past 30+ years.
Take a look at the last paragraph of your OP. Unless you're a different Wrangor, you're forgetting something.
At second look, I was not clear. One of those situations where you know what you are thinking and don't make it clear on paper. I subsequently made myself very clear I think . Sorry for the confusion. I do not, nor ever thought that Obama was executively changing the minimum wage for the entire country to 10.10.
Why do you think Obama is changing the minimum wage for the entire country to 10.10?
How do you propose fixing the "corporate greedy bastards" part of the problem?