Point of clarification: the judge didn't find anything unconstitutional; He granted a preliminary injunction, which means that the court found that, at this preliminary stage, the party seeking the injunction has demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the underlying claim, among other things.
Remember: You should not need an ID to vote but you should need one to hear the attorney general or first lady speak.
Kitchin, what are you talking about?
"Economus concluded that the law was unconstitutional in changing the in-person early voting deadline and that the state was wrongly valuing certain votes above others"
Dirk, I had the details correct as you can see from above.
You don't have a constitutional right to attend an invitation only event or a closed event.