Nah... it's Katie Hill the congresswoman from CA who was staunchly opposed to Brett Kavanaugh's nomination as he was a sexual predator:
Well done, Kates
Except there's no evidence that she's a sexual predator. The relationship between her and the female staffer was a consensual one between adults.
You must be confused (as usual) due to the number of relationships in this story but I'm not referring to the relationship with the campaign staffer.
Any thoughts on the relationship with her male Legislative Director who was a subordinate and clearly against House ethics rules??
And why did Speaker Pelosi issue a statement referencing workplace dignity and integrity if everything was on the up-and-up?
You must be confused (as usual) due to the number of relationships in this story but I'm not referring to the relationship with the campaign staffer.
Any thoughts on the relationship with her male Legislative Director who was a subordinate and clearly against House ethics rules??
And why did Speaker Pelosi issue a statement referencing workplace dignity and integrity if everything was on the up-and-up?
This isn't hard, Angus. She has denied the relationship with male staffer, and several articles have said there is no evidence of it, although a number of conservative blogs have certainly been pushing the story. Maybe she did, maybe she didn't. If she did she should have resigned, but it still in no way compares to what Kavanaugh was accused of, which was sexual assault. Hill has accused her soon-to-be ex-husband of assault, which is pretty close to what Kavanaugh is accused of. If you want to draw false equivalences to her possible (though denied and not proven) consensual affair with a male staffer with Kavanaugh being accused of sexual assault, and pretend that she's somehow a hypocrite, then by all means go ahead. If you can't tell the difference between the two cases, though, that's on you.
Weird, a Democrat accused of wrongdoing resigned. Per usual. And Angus is here to tell us how bad she is anyway.
Amazing and transparent the stuff Angus decides to post about these days.
Stop with this #goteam bullshit. She had a sexual relationship with a female staffer. In what world is that okay? If Hill were a male pub, you would (rightly) be saying that the power dynamics of the boss-subordinate relationship vitiated the staffer’s consent.
You think that’s okay?
A simple flow chart for the Tunnels Left:
A simple flow chart for the Tunnels Left:
You think that’s okay?