• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Ongoing Dem Debacle Thread: Commander will kill us all

I wonder who Gavin Newsome will name to take her place.

Hubby is absolute scum.
 
Phew. I confused her with Katie Porter. I’m glad Katie Porter is still around.
 
Nah... it's Katie Hill the congresswoman from CA who was staunchly opposed to Brett Kavanaugh's nomination as he was a sexual predator:

 
Nah... it's Katie Hill the congresswoman from CA who was staunchly opposed to Brett Kavanaugh's nomination as he was a sexual predator:


Except there's no evidence that she's a sexual predator. The relationship between her and the female staffer was a consensual one between adults. Actually, she's accusing her husband of being abusive in their marriage, which is one of the reasons why she's getting a divorce. So, yeah, that opposition to Kavanaugh might actually hit home with her in a very personal way.
 
Except there's no evidence that she's a sexual predator. The relationship between her and the female staffer was a consensual one between adults.

You must be confused (as usual) due to the number of relationships in this story but I'm not referring to the relationship with the campaign staffer.

Any thoughts on the relationship with her male Legislative Director who was a subordinate and clearly against House ethics rules??

And why did Speaker Pelosi issue a statement referencing workplace dignity and integrity if everything was on the up-and-up?

 
You must be confused (as usual) due to the number of relationships in this story but I'm not referring to the relationship with the campaign staffer.

Any thoughts on the relationship with her male Legislative Director who was a subordinate and clearly against House ethics rules??

And why did Speaker Pelosi issue a statement referencing workplace dignity and integrity if everything was on the up-and-up?


This isn't hard, Angus. She has denied the relationship with male staffer, and several articles have said there is no evidence of it, although a number of conservative blogs have certainly been pushing the story. Maybe she did, maybe she didn't. If she did she should have resigned, but it still in no way compares to what Kavanaugh was accused of, which was sexual assault. Hill has accused her soon-to-be ex-husband of assault, which is pretty close to what Kavanaugh is accused of. If you want to draw false equivalences to her possible (though denied and not proven) consensual affair with a male staffer with Kavanaugh being accused of sexual assault, and pretend that she's somehow a hypocrite, then by all means go ahead. If you can't tell the difference between the two cases, though, that's on you.
 
You must be confused (as usual) due to the number of relationships in this story but I'm not referring to the relationship with the campaign staffer.

Any thoughts on the relationship with her male Legislative Director who was a subordinate and clearly against House ethics rules??

And why did Speaker Pelosi issue a statement referencing workplace dignity and integrity if everything was on the up-and-up?


Oh, well, I guess I’ll just become a Trump supporter then. That guy is in the up and up.
 
This isn't hard, Angus. She has denied the relationship with male staffer, and several articles have said there is no evidence of it, although a number of conservative blogs have certainly been pushing the story. Maybe she did, maybe she didn't. If she did she should have resigned, but it still in no way compares to what Kavanaugh was accused of, which was sexual assault. Hill has accused her soon-to-be ex-husband of assault, which is pretty close to what Kavanaugh is accused of. If you want to draw false equivalences to her possible (though denied and not proven) consensual affair with a male staffer with Kavanaugh being accused of sexual assault, and pretend that she's somehow a hypocrite, then by all means go ahead. If you can't tell the difference between the two cases, though, that's on you.

he can’t tell the difference. he’s a fucking moron.
 
Watching Brad stretch (and stretch and stretch) to try and find a GOTCHA moment regarding this, the President's attacks on the media vis-a-vis the Obama administration, and the the killing of the ISIS leader has been entertaining. Idiotic, but entertaining.
 
Weird, a Democrat accused of wrongdoing resigned. Per usual. And Angus is here to tell us how bad she is anyway.

Amazing and transparent the stuff Angus decides to post about these days.
 
Weird, a Democrat accused of wrongdoing resigned. Per usual. And Angus is here to tell us how bad she is anyway.

Amazing and transparent the stuff Angus decides to post about these days.

something something governor and lt governor of Virginia
 
Angus and sailor perfectly represent the state of the GOP right now. So much insecurity about their party (identities) that they go after Dems for minor (or fake) shit that pales in comparison to Trump and the rampant corruption in the GOP while not taking responsibility for any of the bullshit in their party. Gotta make yourself feel better by going after a resigning Dem than not going after their guy who has countless sexual assault claims against him and is on tape bragging about committing assault. So brave and principled, they are.
 
Stop with this #goteam bullshit. She had a sexual relationship with a female staffer. In what world is that okay? If Hill were a male pub, you would (rightly) be saying that the power dynamics of the boss-subordinate relationship vitiated the staffer’s consent.

You think that’s a sexual predator?
 
A simple flow chart for the Tunnels Left:

 
You think that’s okay?

None of it is ok, but she has resigned in shame and her career in Democratic politics is probably over. That seems like pretty good punishment for a promising political career.
 
A simple flow chart for the Tunnels Left:


Simple flow chart for all republicans everywhere:

Republicans, Do what ever you want when ever you want —————> no one cares, we might even elect you president or put you in the Supreme Court.

Democrats, do what ever you want when you want —————> right leaning news papers will publish revenge porn of you and you’ll have to resign in shame thus ending your political career.
 
They all come out of the woodwork coincidentally to hammer this and only this. Shocker. Where’s wrangor to pile on?
 
A simple flow chart for the Tunnels Left:


A) what birdman said
B) she’s resigning, did you miss that part?
C) should Trump resign, Angus?

No one is defending her. People are just laughing at the “tunnels right” because they come out for this (despite her resignation) yet are crickets on Trump and his daily violations. Weak sauce phony outrage bullshit. Not hard to understand.
 
Back
Top