So in your view being appointed to the Supreme Court requires that we treat unsubstantiated accusations with no corroborating evidence as true? Do you honestly think that an allegation alone, with nothing to suggest it’s credibility, should be enough to derail a nomination? You have no proof that he lied under oath, he didn’t, that’s just the desperate back pedaling as everyone realizes these allegations will never be substantiated and they need to start pushing the goal posts back to “Yeah but he drank more than he says he did! And he got really mad when we called him a rapist!”
But yeah, totally, we’re living in a rape culture because we don’t believe every woman that makes an accusation at face value. Basically the dark ages.