Louis Gossett Jr
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Messages
- 12,822
- Reaction score
- 6,656
Your life actions and thoughts probably do a good enough job painting you as despicable but the more formal term is deplorable.
If you don't believe he lied then i would suggest you are either purposely biased or extremely gullible.
Your life actions and thoughts probably do a good enough job painting you as despicable but the more formal term is deplorable.
If you are seriously still on this yearbook thing I would say you are delusional and so desperate for some reason to not have a conservative majority on the Supreme Court that you would find fault with Kavanaugh regardless of his integrity or actions. If he ends up being brought up on perjury charges relating to his yearbook and doesn’t get the nomination I will eat my hat, it’s never in a million years going to happen. Even congressional democrats know that. This entire debacle has been nothing but a failed stall tactic, and a morally reprehensible one at that.
If you are seriously still on this yearbook thing I would say you are delusional and so desperate for some reason to not have a conservative majority on the Supreme Court that you would find fault with Kavanaugh regardless of his integrity or actions. If he ends up being brought up on perjury charges relating to his yearbook and doesn’t get the nomination I will eat my hat, it’s never in a million years going to happen. Even congressional democrats know that. This entire debacle has been nothing but a failed stall tactic, and a morally reprehensible one at that.
Dude nice, I can tell actually arguing with me is frustrating you since you’re already resorting to searching my username and going ad hominem. Does it hurt your brain to be arguing such a stupid position? It must, I hope this is helping.
On the other thread I have shown specific lies that Kavanaugh has told in EACH of his Senate confirmation hearings. Apparently no amount of lies is disqualifying to being on the Supreme Court to you.
Nothing like his abject rant during his opening statement against the Clintons, fictitious donors who and LW conspiracies has ever happened in at least the past 75 years (I'd bet ever) of Supreme Court hearings. He acted like a twelve year old on the playground not a person interviewing for a lifetime job on the Supreme Court.
It’s almost as if accusing a nominee of heinous sex crimes with absolutely no evidence, then forcing him to defend himself is a rather rare occurrence. They threw the witch in the river and she floated, so now they want to burn her at the stake. If Kavanaugh hadn’t had the impassioned response that he did the dems would’ve said his lack of emotion was a sure sign of his guilt. His testimony saved his nomination, pure and simple.
What a total load of crap. He yelled at and tried to question senators. He asked a sitting US Senator if she had a drinking problem. Try that in your next job interview.
You intentionally neglected the fact that has committed perjury in EVERY Senate hearing. Maybe you think committing crimes is a prerequisite to being on the Supreme Court. Maybe we should hire a serial killer to run the FBI or a bank robber to run the FDIC.
Oh definitely Jhmd, just figured he would come back and post with his real name since he was never afraid of a hot take
If you are seriously still on this yearbook thing I would say you are delusional and so desperate for some reason to not have a conservative majority on the Supreme Court that you would find fault with Kavanaugh regardless of his integrity or actions. If he ends up being brought up on perjury charges relating to his yearbook and doesn’t get the nomination I will eat my hat, it’s never in a million years going to happen. Even congressional democrats know that. This entire debacle has been nothing but a failed stall tactic, and a morally reprehensible one at that.
So Blasley Ford is lying?
Lindsey Graham was on ABC's This Week this morning, and he just came right out and said that he believes that Ford was "mistaken" in her accusations, and that she has "problems." I think every liberal knew that right-wingers, even the leaders of the GOP, would finally get there - they've mostly stopped saying they believe her story (probably doesn't play well with the base), and now they're just saying it was a case of mistaken identity or that she's got "problems" - the classic blaming-the-victim strategy that has worked so well before. I'm wondering how long it will be before we get to the slut-shaming part of the treatment.
So Blasley Ford is lying?
I can’t say she’s lying, I wasn’t there, but she’s provided absolutely no evidence aside from her testimony, so no, I don’t believe that’s adequate for me to say that a well respected judge is a sex criminal. The democrats knew this accusation wouldn’t stand up to scrutiny, they put it forward and put her through this anyway because they thought they could stall the nomination until after the midterms. You have to be supremely biased to think that one woman’s testimony with no contemporaneous witnesses to even say such a party occurred is enough to destroy a man’s life. There is zero evidence he committed perjury, there is zero evidence to suggest he committed sexual assault. At this point all the dems are left with is criticizing how he defended himself from a blatantly partisan witch hunt, much like Clarence Thomas had to do.
I can’t say she’s lying, I wasn’t there, but she’s provided absolutely no evidence aside from her testimony, so no, I don’t believe that’s adequate for me to say that a well respected judge is a sex criminal. The democrats knew this accusation wouldn’t stand up to scrutiny, they put it forward and put her through this anyway because they thought they could stall the nomination until after the midterms. You have to be supremely biased to think that one woman’s testimony with no contemporaneous witnesses to even say such a party occurred is enough to destroy a man’s life. There is zero evidence he committed perjury, there is zero evidence to suggest he committed sexual assault. At this point all the dems are left with is criticizing how he defended himself from a blatantly partisan witch hunt, much like Clarence Thomas had to do.
So yes you are apparently okay with a Supreme Court Justice candidate lying however he needs to in order to get out of a sticky situation..
Yes they have. None of the supposed witnesses she put forward were willing to even say such a party happened.
Why didn’t the republicans call any of them as witnesses? They could have asked them what they remember and don’t remember on record. Oh well, missed opportunity...put him in the court!