warak, can you give more detail about what your scrimmages have told you about Lung? I'm looking at him for either position, maybe even at SG if he can do it. I have him ahead of Vanmeter and my PG/SG maxes.
sure, this is what i got in scrimmages:
at PF:
14.1ppg(53%,34%,79%), 6rpg, 1.59/1 ast/to, 0.94bpg and 0.78spg
at SF:
12.4ppg(51%,34%,86%), 4.9rpg, 1.62/1.83 ast/to, 0.52bpg and 0.26spg
at C:
12.1ppg(53%,42%,83%), 6.35rpg, 1.64/0.74 ast/to, 1.27bpg and 0.48spg
it appears that C is best statistically, but he was out-rebounded by > 1.5rpg and the opposing C never shot under 52%. unfortunately, the further down the lineup he goes the higher his turnovers followed. overall, i guess i would put him at PF but his lack of D is going to hurt.
just for measure, i played him against very good competition...he is an OK player but hopefully a 6th man. :noidea:
edited to say that initially Lung played better, when i was getting a feel for players and their ratings. so he played lesser players and shot and rebounded better. defense was always a little bit of an issue but i needed scoring and thought he would be only a 2/2 or 3/3. a 5/5 should be an instant starter and a successful all-around player or a dominant scorer, which i thought he was. top defenders (like my other recruits) seem to shut him down...but top defenders usually do!