• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Replacement for ObamaCare by Dr. Rand Paul

TheReff

Rod Griffin
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
6,438
Reaction score
565
The Obamacare Replacement Act (S. 222) Sen. Rand Paul, M.D.
Repealing Obamacare – Effective as of the date of enactment of this bill, the following provisions of Obamacare are repealed: o Individual and employer mandates, community rating restrictions, rate review, essential health benefits requirement, medical loss ratio, and other insurance mandates.
Protecting Individuals with Pre-Existing Conditions
• Provides a two-year open-enrollment period under which individuals with pre-existing conditions can obtain coverage.
• Restores HIPAA pre-existing conditions protections. Prior to Obamacare, HIPAA guaranteed those within the group market could obtain continuous health coverage regardless of preexisting conditions.
Equalize the Tax Treatment of Health Insurance
• Individuals who receive health insurance through an employer are able to exclude the premium amount from their taxable income. However, this subsidy is unavailable for those that do not receive their insurance through an employer but instead shop for insurance on the individual market.
• Equalizes the tax treatment of the purchase of health insurance for individuals and employers. By providing a universal deduction on both income and payroll taxes regardless of how an individual obtains their health insurance, Americans will be empowered to purchase insurance independent of employment. Furthermore, this provision does not interfere with employer- provided coverage for Americans who prefer those plans.
Expansion of Health Savings Accounts
• Tax Credit for HSA Contributions o Provides individuals the option of a tax credit of up to $5,000 per taxpayer for contributions to an HSA. If an individual chooses not to accept the tax credit or contributes in excess of $5,000, those contributions are still tax-preferred.
• Maximum Contribution Limit to HSA o Removes the maximum allowable annual contribution, so that individuals may make unlimited contributions to an HSA.
• Eliminates the requirement that a participant in an HSA be enrolled in a high deductible health care plan o Currently, in order to be eligible to establish and use an HSA, an individual must be enrolled in a high-deductible health plan. This section removes the HSA plan type requirement to allow individuals with all types of insurance to establish and use an HSA. o This would also enable individuals who are eligible for Medicare, VA benefits, TRICARE, IHS, and members of health care sharing ministries to be eligible to establish an HSA.
• Allowance of Distributions for Prescription and OTC Drugs o Allows prescription and OTC drug costs to be treated as allowable expenses of HSAs.
• Purchase of Health Insurance from HSA Account
• Currently, HSA funds may not be used to purchase insurance or cover the cost of premiums. Allowing the use of HSA funds for insurance premiums will help make health coverage more affordable for American families.
• Medical Expenses Incurred Prior to Account Establishment o Allows qualified expenses incurred prior to HSA establishment to be reimbursed from an HSA as long as the account is established prior to tax filing.
• Administrative Error Correction Before Due Date of Return o Amends current law by allowing for administrative or clerical error corrections on filings.
• Allowing HSA Rollover to Child or Parent of Account Holder o Allows an account holder’s HSA to rollover to a child, parent, or grandparent, in addition to a spouse.
• Equivalent Bankruptcy Protections for HSAs as Retirement Funds o Most tax-exempt retirement accounts are also fully exempt from bankruptcy by federal law. While some states have passed laws that exempt HSA funds from being seized in bankruptcy, there is no federal protection for HSA funds in bankruptcy.
• Certain Exercise Equipment and Physical Fitness Programs to be Treated as Medical Care o Expands allowable HSA expenses to include equipment for physical exercise or health coaching, including weight loss programs.
• Nutritional and Dietary Supplements to be Treated as Medical Care o Amends the definition of “medical care” to include dietary and nutritional supplements for the purposes of HSA expenditures.
• Certain Providers Fees to be Treated as Medical Care o Allows HSA funds to be used for periodic fees paid to medical practitioners for access to medical care.
• Capitated Primary Care Payments – HSAs can be used for pre-paid physician fees, which includes payments associated with “concierge” or “direct practice” medicine.
• Provisions Relating to Medicare – Allows Medicare enrollees to contribute their own money to the Medicare Medical Savings Accounts (MSAs).
Charity Care and Bad Debt Deduction for Physicians
• Amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow a physician a tax deduction equal to the amount such physician would otherwise charge for charity medical care or uncompensated care due to bad debt. This deduction is limited to 10% of a physician’s gross income for the taxable year.
Pool Reform for the Individual Market
• Establishes Independent Health Pools (IHPs) in order to allow individuals to pool together for the purposes of purchasing insurance.
• Amends the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) to allow individuals to pool together to provide for health benefits coverage through Individual Health Pools (IHPs). These can include non- profit organizations (including churches, alumni associations, trade associations, other civic groups, or entities formed strictly for establishing an IHP) so long as the organization does not condition membership on any health status-related factor.
• Requires that the IHP will provide insurance through contracts with health insurance issuers in fully insured plans and not assume insurance risk with respect to such coverage. Allows the IHP to provide administrative services to members, including accounting, billings, and enrollment information.
Interstate Market for Health Insurance Cooperative Governing of Individual Health Insurance Coverage
• Increases access to individual health coverage by allowing insurers licensed to sell policies in one state to offer them to residents of any other state.
• Exempts issuers from secondary state laws that would prohibit or regulate their operation in the secondary state. However, states may impose requirements such as consumer protections and applicable taxes, among others.
• Prohibits an issuer from offering, selling, or issuing individual health insurance coverage in a secondary state: o If the state insurance commissioner does not use a risk-based capital formula for the determination of capital and surplus requirements for all issuers. o Unless both the secondary and primary states have legislation or regulations in place establishing an independent review process for individuals who have individual health insurance coverage; or o The issuer provides an acceptable mechanism under which the review is conducted by an independent medical reviewer or panel.
• Gives sole jurisdiction to the primary state to enforce the primary state’s covered laws in the primary state and any secondary state.
• Allows the secondary state to notify the primary state if the coverage offered in the secondary state fails to comply with the covered laws in the primary state.
Association Health Plans
• Association Health Plans (AHPs) allow small businesses to pool together across state lines through their membership in a trade or professional association to purchase health coverage for their employees and their families. AHPs increase the bargaining power, leverage discounts, and provide administrative efficiencies to small businesses while freeing them from state benefit mandates.
• While AHPs currently exist, strict Department of Labor standards exist regarding the types of organizations that may qualify as a single large-group health plan under ERISA. The standard stipulates that the association must be a group of employers bound together by a commonality of interest (aside from providing a health plan) with vested control of the association to such an extent that they effectively operate as one employer. This is considered a difficult standard for most associations to meet.
• Amends ERISA to define AHPs and allow for their treatment as if they were large group single employer health plans. This definition would allow a dues-collecting organization maintained in good faith for a purpose other than providing health insurance to benefit from the insurance regulation exclusions currently afforded to large-group health plans under ERISA.
• Requires solvency standards to protect patients’ rights and ensure benefits are paid. o Requires AHPs to have an indemnified back-up plan in order to prevent unpaid claims in the event of plan termination. o AHPs must undergo independent actuarial certification for financial viability on a regular basis.
o Requires AHPs to maintain surplus reserves of at least $500,000 in addition to normal claims reserves, stop loss insurance, or indemnification insurance.
Anti-Trust Reform for Healthcare
• Provides an exemption from Federal antitrust laws for health care professionals engaged in negotiations with a health plan regarding the terms of a contract under which the professionals provide health care items or services.
• This section applies only to health care professionals excluded from the National Labor Relations Act. It would also not apply to contracts or care provided under Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, the FEHBP, or the IHS as well as medical and dental care provided to members of the uniformed services and veterans.
Increasing State Flexibility to Conduct Medicaid Waivers
• Provides new flexibilities to states in their Medicaid plan design, through existing waiver authority in current law.
• For many years, including under Obamacare, States have had the option to request a waiver from HHS to allow states to test new coverage rules under Medicaid and other programs. This provision would allow states to make changes to their Medicaid plans without interference from Washington.
Self-Insurance Protections
• Amends the definition of “health insurance coverage” under the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), and parallel sections of ERISA and the Tax Code, to clarify that stop-loss insurance is not health insurance.
• This provision is designed to prevent the federal government from using rule-making to restrict the availability of stop-loss insurance used by self-insured plans.
http://chrislittleton.com/rand-paul-obamacare-replacement/
_______________________________________________________________________
 
This sounds pretty good and is a step towards decoupling health insurance from employment.

Equalize the Tax Treatment of Health Insurance
• Individuals who receive health insurance through an employer are able to exclude the premium amount from their taxable income. However, this subsidy is unavailable for those that do not receive their insurance through an employer but instead shop for insurance on the individual market.

• Equalizes the tax treatment of the purchase of health insurance for individuals and employers. By providing a universal deduction on both income and payroll taxes regardless of how an individual obtains their health insurance, Americans will be empowered to purchase insurance independent of employment. Furthermore, this provision does not interfere with employer- provided coverage for Americans who prefer those plans.
 
This sounds pretty good and is a step towards decoupling health insurance from employment.

As is removing the employer mandate.

I'll read more before weighing in, but it doesn't seem like you need to repeal to get most of this stuff done.
 
Even if you repeal and replace it at exactly the same time, if you don't have a very long time to have the paperwork and other management and delivery processes put in place, it will be a national nightmare.
 
Anything to get rid of Obamacare and the 50% increase just in the premiums since it came out--$12,000 in the national average for a family to over $18,000 this year. Made the upper 2% of income people pay more needlessly and made the younger, more healthy people pay way more needlessly.
 
I'll read more before weighing in, but it doesn't seem like you need to repeal to get most of this stuff done.

Just make an executive order and call it Trumpcare if it's really about the name. These people are post-stupid.
 
Even if you repeal and replace it at exactly the same time, if you don't have a very long time to have the paperwork and other management and delivery processes put in place, it will be a national nightmare.

If only Pubs could implement their healthcare plan as smoothly as the previous administration did, amirite RJ?
 
This sounds pretty good and is a step towards decoupling health insurance from employment.

employers would have to stop subsidizing their employees health insurance for it to matter, which is a huge culture shock for everyone whose employers pay most or all of their insurance. I'd basically get $500 a month taken out of my paycheck if my employer made me reimburse them. Making employers raise wages and then passing through the whole costs to the employees would do the trick though.
 
Anything to get rid of Obamacare and the 50% increase just in the premiums since it came out--$12,000 in the national average for a family to over $18,000 this year. Made the upper 2% of income people pay more needlessly and made the younger, more healthy people pay way more needlessly.

How does it make the upper 2% of income people pay more? Because they're the ones that are paying out premiums as business owners or what?
 
How does it make the upper 2% of income people pay more? Because they're the ones that are paying out premiums as business owners or what?

Yes, but in addition the upper 2% already had insurance. Basically Obamacare had them subsidize the poor on their own plans. It gets exponential too, as mostly the upper 2% are older. For example, (I pay our insurance bill) the wealthier (older) guys premiums are 3x as much as mine.

In my company of 50 people, we have exactly 2 people who put their dependents on our plan. The 2 owners. Its way too expensive for anyone else to do the same, so pretty much all of our employees spouses and children get worse coverage. It's a big problem for the country. Every employee has the option to put their dependents/spouses on our plan, none do.
 
Last edited:
How does it make the upper 2% of income people pay more? Because they're the ones that are paying out premiums as business owners or what?

It's not just the upper 2%. Folks like me who are self employed and who make too much to get a subsidy saw their rates skyrocket the last 2 years. I do hope Pubs can implement something that is more affordable that will work. If they're successful, that would make the presidency unattainable for Dems the next couple of cycles. But if they get rid of the mandate and don't establish a mechanism for getting all the 20-30somethings on board, it'll still be inefficient, a ton of folks won't be covered, and it'll still be way expensive for folks like me who decide to pay for it.
 
I went a month without coverage while switching jobs, as my current job makes you wait a month. Cobra for one month would have been $900, I said "Fuck that, I'll chance it"

10 years ago when self employed I got coverage for about $50/month.
 
A single payer system would address a lot of these issues.
 
I went a month without coverage while switching jobs, as my current job makes you wait a month. Cobra for one month would have been $900, I said "Fuck that, I'll chance it"

10 years ago when self employed I got coverage for about $50/month.

Yeah I held off in between jobs waiting 30 days for it to kick in. I understand you can buy COBRA retroactively if you need it?
 
Yeah I held off in between jobs waiting 30 days for it to kick in. I understand you can buy COBRA retroactively if you need it?

Not sure. Also possible I fucked myself because I've heard people say that going without coverage for a short period has fucked them for eternity afterwards. I don't know enough to know if that's true.
 
I went a month without coverage while switching jobs, as my current job makes you wait a month. Cobra for one month would have been $900, I said "Fuck that, I'll chance it"

10 years ago when self employed I got coverage for about $50/month.

That was in your 20s and several STDs ago.
 
Back
Top