BobStackFan4Life
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 31,661
- Reaction score
- 1,538
I read an old article not too long ago that basically asked if Jim Grobe was dirty because of Wake's blocking. Can't find it but found this one instead. Do you think the bad press could've eventually had an impact? I always felt it had more to do with other fans being sore losers that they lost to "little ole Wake Forest".
"I definitely have a lot of animosity toward the Wake Forest (offensive) linemen because of that," Page told the Winston-Salem Journal. "I thought, 'These guys are trying to hurt me, so I'm going to try and hurt them."
Wake Forest is first in the ACC in first downs (193), second in time of possession (31:59), third in total offense (407.1 yards per game) and first in rushing offense (249.3 ypg). While FSU defensive coordinator Mickey Andrews has not accused Wake Forest of chop blocking, he and others have questioned their approach.
"Well, it's just ridiculous," Grobe said of the accusations.
"In no way do we do that. First of all, you have to have two guys blocking one to end up in a chop-block situation. Our feeling is in our running game if we are wasting blockers if we've got two guys blocking one guy. We are just trying to run the football. We're a team that leads the ACC in rushing and that's by design. We want to run the football. You can't run the football by blocking people up high. That's just the way we are.
"I think North Carolina is a team that throws the football. They do a lot of drop-back passing and probably against each other a lot. I can see when you get into a week where you have a week to prepare for our running game, where we block you low, it's a tough preparation. We are not doing anything outside the rules. We are not the National Football League, and I think that's one of the best things about college football. We have a lot of different types of offenses. We're not a team that's going to drop back and throw the football 50-60 times a game.
"We primarily a team that's going to run it and we block low to do that. It's good, fundamental football. We teach our kids to play low with a flat back and a low pad level, and off the back side. If you're thought is defensively that you're going to run up the football on us and we're going to try to get you on the ground. So, it makes you have play on defense with your hands down. It makes you have to play good, technique football with your pads square, and if you're not going to do that you are going to get on the ground quite a bit. That's just the way we always played.
"When I was at the Air Force Academy, at Ohio University and here, we've got athletic offensive linemen. We don't have a lot of big, file cabinets on wheels. We've got guys who aren't very big but have fairly good athletic ability. The only way we can run the football effectively is if we block low. It has absolutely nothing to do with chop blocks. We've never chopped anybody. We've never taught that. We won't teach that. We would never try to hurt anybody, but we do block low. We are a good, fundamental offensive line and that's the way we play.
http://floridastate.scout.com/2/72963.htmlCut blocking, or blocking below the waist, is legal at the line of scrimmage.
"They really stretch you defensively with misdirection and angle blocks," Andrews told the Tallahassee Democrat. "Very seldom do they ask a lineman to reach back and knock you off the line. A lot of cutting. A lot of it, you know, I don't know why it's allowed in football to begin with. Diving at somebody's knee, cutting them like that. We don't make the rules. That's their type of football. You just hope you go out there and play low and play hard and come out of the game healthy."
North Carolina coach John Bunting said that the blocks are dangerous and that he has seen careers end because of them.
"We had three called in the game," Bunting said. "There probably could have been some more. I know one thing: I won't allow it to be coached on this football team. I'm not going to comment on Wake Forest."
Last edited: