• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Richard Cohen

BeachBumDeac

Cheap Date
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
27,661
Reaction score
15,248
Holy shit dude, really?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...b05-11e3-ac54-aa84301ced81_story.html?hpid=z2

Today’s GOP is not racist, as Harry Belafonte alleged about the tea party, but it is deeply troubled — about the expansion of government, about immigration, about secularism, about the mainstreaming of what used to be the avant-garde. People with conventional views must repress a gag reflex when considering the mayor-elect of New York — a white man married to a black woman and with two biracial children. (Should I mention that Bill de Blasio’s wife, Chirlane McCray, used to be a lesbian?) This family represents the cultural changes that have enveloped parts — but not all — of America. To cultural conservatives, this doesn’t look like their country at all.
 
Wait, so now they want women to stay lesbian?
 
not to defend Cohen, because he has written plenty of questionable things...but if you read the full piece, it's pretty clear he is assigning these views to others - of whom he disapproves. The problem word is "conventional," which has the effect of legitimatizing his subjects.

Basically, I think this piece in Slate gets it right. Cohen may be a lout, but his main problems here are editing and prose. http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2013/11/12/richard_cohen_s_racist_interracial_marriage_gag_column_analyzing_conventions.html
[/URL]
 
^

Umm...yep. Not his views is pretty obvious.

Appreciate the link in the article to the Tea Party "anthem":

 
A lot of faux outrage from the left on this. The GOP is accused of this on a daily basis, but suddenly it's an issue because it came from the WaPo and a supposedly reputable hack like Cohen?


----------
Tapatalk.
 
A lot of faux outrage from the left on this. The GOP is accused of this on a daily basis, but suddenly it's an issue because it came from the WaPo and a supposedly reputable hack like Cohen?

If the right wants to be clear of these sorts of accusations, I'm sure they'll push ENDA through the house, correct?
 
A lot of faux outrage from the left on this. The GOP is accused of this on a daily basis, but suddenly it's an issue because it came from the WaPo and a supposedly reputable hack like Cohen?


----------
Tapatalk.

I think it's because he was claiming that it's a "conventional" view to be against interracial marriage
 
ELC, going to take a stab at answering bym's question?

Sorry, I was driving home and then took a nap. I don't live on these boards. I also had to look up wtf ENDA was. GOP claims it'll kill jobs or some such nonsense. It's not getting votes probably cuz people think trannies are fucked up and they're included in the bill.

Not that that has anything to do with a comment implying that the GOP (or just the tea party, if we are to believe Cohen's parsing), is racist.


----------
Tapatalk.
 
A good take, IMO, by TNC:

The problem here isn't that we think Richard Cohen gags at the sight of an interracial couple and their children. The problem is that Richard Cohen thinks being repulsed isn't actually racist, but "conventional" or "culturally conservative." Obstructing the right of black humans and white humans to form families is a central feature of American racism. If retching at the thought of that right being exercised isn't racism, then there is no racism.

Context can not improve this. "Context" is not a safe word that makes all your other horse-shit statements disappear. And horse-shit is the context in which Richard Cohen has, for all these years, wallowed. It is horse-shit to claim that store owners are right to discriminate against black males. It is horse-shit to claim Trayvon Martin was wearing the uniform of criminals. It is horse-shit to subject your young female co-workers to "a hostile work environment." It is horse-shit to expend precious newsprint lamenting the days when slovenly old dudes had their pick of 20-year-old women. It is horse-shit to defend a rapist on the run because you like The Pianist. And it is horse-shit for Katharine Weymouth, the Post's publisher, to praise a column with the kind of factual error that would embarrass a j-school student.

Richard Cohen's unfortunate career is the proper context to understand his column today and the wide outrage that's greeted it. We are being told that Cohen finds it "hurtful" to be called racist. I am sorry that people on the Internet have hurt Richard Cohen's feelings. I find it "hurtful" that Cohen endorses the police profiling my son. I find it eternally "hurtful" that the police, following that same logic, killed one of my friends. I find it hurtful to tell my students that, even in this modern age, vending horse-shit is still an esteemed and lucrative profession.
 
Good take. White conservatives should be very offended by that column and working to change that perception.
 
Well, the abhorrent views are conventional/traditional amongst a significant portion of our population. I think that's what he's getting at...not trying to agree with. And I think he was trying to suggest (or allow) that the Republican Party, as a whole, isn't racist in some institutional or intentional sense. But that those more culturally conservative amongst that party are those tending to long for the good old days when certain lines were brighter...lines that indeed reek of racism/sexism/etc. Sure, he could've been more explicit on the point, but I think it comes across.

I admit I don't follow Cohen enough to have a feel for the context of this particular piece within his larger writings.
 
Back
Top