WakeForestRanger
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 22,959
- Reaction score
- 1,169
That’s some solid tweeting: claims the unitary executive theory “has no textual basis” yet links to a Vox article that sets forth the unitary executive theory’s textual basis.
ph posts tweet, junebug kneejerks and ph updates with tweet predicting knee-jerk.
amazing stuff
sorry pard, but you used to try and act like some type of highly principled conservative instead of the goofy hack you have proven yourself to be
Is this thread where we put nominations for federal judge who are partisan hacks with no real legal experience?
If so:
http://www.abajournal.com/news/arti...uring-hearing-for-nominee-rated-not-qualified
The Trump administration notified the American Bar Association (ABA) on March 17, 2017, that the group would no longer receive special access to background information on judicial candidates prior to their nomination. A letter to the ABA from White House Counsel Donald F. McGahn II said that all organizations would receive the background information in equal fashion.[1]
Some ABA supporters criticized the action as retaliation against the group’s low ratings of several of President Trump’s judicial nominees. Some critics contended that the ABA ratings favored liberal judges over conservatives.
As of September 25, 2019, the ABA had rated 188 of President Trump’s nominees; 124 were rated “well-qualified,” 56 were rated “qualified,” and eight were rated “not qualified.”
Dick-swinging beer boy sure was worth it.
https://ballotpedia.org/ABA_ratings_during_the_Trump_administration
Why do Republicans love nominating "not qualified" individuals?