BillBrasky
#PSF
I can appreciate the micro success, but I can't look past the inequality and hypocrisy of the macro
And its gotten a lot worse recently
And its gotten a lot worse recently
Yeah, its not great, but I do (did) see selflessness everyday. And it is the best part of my job.
However I know how stacked the world is against them, and makes me wonder, "what's the point?". The kids who aren't college ready will end up working some shitty jobs, maybe end up in jail, and have a 5-10% chance of being remotely successful. The kids who are college ready will do much better, sure, but there are not many of them. And those kids are still going to struggle as our general quality of life decreases due to our pyramid economic scheme.
IDK maybe I need to quit and open my own business or something. Do something honest, and if I lose, I lose. But now that I have a wife and a family that's not cool either. I just don't know if I keep blowing smoke up the asses of the children who have no chance to succeed in our system. I could switch to a less impoverished school but I'm don't think my message will resonate there either. Maybe I'll just drink more.
This speaks to the value of a pension system as much as it speaks to the importance of the stock market.
Where do you think those pensions invest their money?
I think I get what you’re trying to get at. When you stated that “only a small percentage of people are day to day worried about the stock market for their own personal wealth” that’s just not stated well. I think what you’re trying to say is that movements of individual stocks on a day to day basis are probably only having the largest impacts on the far richer class?
For example, say the S&P 500 goes up 1% in a day. That’s essentially a stand in for “the stock market,” generally speaking. Everyone who is invested in an S&P 500 fund in their 401k (i.e. almost everyone) saw that component of their personal wealth go up 1%. It impacts all of them. But say one of the 500 stocks in that index went up 25% for some reason. Folks that hold share of just that stock instead of having it as a 1/500th of their S&P 500 fund (which are likely the richer folks who own stocks) get a proportionately higher return. Which is true. I think that’s what you’re saying.
Keep in mind the individual stocks also have higher risk of loss than the broader market so if there’s a stock in that 500 that lost 25% that day some rich schlub ate a proportionately bigger bite of shit sandwich too.
Where do you think those pensions invest their money?
where does Social Security invest its money?
LOL. I don’t think you followed his point.