Kory
.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2012
- Messages
- 28,617
- Reaction score
- 9,189
Bullshit, any photo of me is art.
Is this like a fragile masculinity thing or do you believe all photographs of people hold artistic value?
Bullshit, any photo of me is art.
This is the lamest argument. And I spent half of yesterday arguing about Doug Wojcik.
Is this like a fragile masculinity thing or do you believe all photographs of people hold artistic value?
Is this like a fragile masculinity thing or do you believe all photographs of people hold artistic value?
yeah, except they whitewashed him in the casting of Office Space
I was joking RJK style because you guys are way over analyzing what is and isn't art.
What do you think art is? Should the presidential portraits be art?
Art is anything that people want it to be. Yes, they are art. No, I don't think having a discussion on whether a license photo is art is worthwhile.
7 pages on a presidential portrait, welcome to 2018.....
Art is anything that people want it to be. Yes, they are art. No, I don't think having a discussion on whether a license photo is art is worthwhile.
7 pages on a presidential portrait, welcome to 2018.....
"Art is anything..." is hardly a definition. Sounds lazy to me. If you think everything can be art, then there is nothing to distinguish what is not art. There are definitely things that are not art.
The tangent about licence photos was just a discussion to see what someone thought defined a portrait. Not the whole discussion.
What do you think art is?
At her portrait’s unveiling Obama said she was thinking of little girls — and girls of color, “who in the years ahead will come to this place and see an image of someone who looks like them hanging on the wall of a great American institution. . . . And I know the kind of impact that will have on their lives because I was one of those girls.”