I don't think I'm very worked up about today's news. Certainly not compared to other instances when I've been worked up about other things.
To the extent I "hate" the financial world, I "hate" it for it's failure to recognize its own inherent instability and consistency in opposing commonsense regulations of institutions that borrow short-term and lend long-term, whether those institutions are retail/commercial banks, repo auctions, or any other funds. Borrowing short and lending long is banking, no matter who's doing it. I don't think it's hard to see that anything that borrows short-term in order to lend long-term is liable to bank runs and should have regulatory oversight and mandatory deposit insurance to combat the psychology that fuels runs, especially when those runs are extraordinarily damaging to both the financial sector and the economy as a whole. But apparently Dimon, Blankfein, and Geithner do have issues with that, likely because they believe they're smarter than other players and don't need those safeguards. The experience of 2008, though, should indicate pretty clearly that those individual players don't matter in terms of setting the best policy for the system. I "hate" the financial world because it's where financial panics occur and it's biggest and most influential players have no shown less than no interest in combating them before they start. I'm not sure that "hate" is the right term, but I'll leave that for others to decide as I am most likely biased.