CreamyGoodness
Thanks Creamy!
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 15,792
- Reaction score
- 5,753
Didn't mean to tag your post Ptown^
Wolford got an entire season to show what he could and couldn't do. Hinton will get a few plays here and there barring injury.
So, we still suck ?
This will sort itself out. Hinton will have his chance to take the reins- he did last year and did not separate himself. Both QBs are prone to big mistakes and bad decisions- whoever is more efficient and can manage the game without the killing mistakes should play.
I still have my doubts about the mind numbing offensive scheme (gracious to call it a scheme) and as a big Clawson supporter I am reluctantly beginning to wonder like some others on the Board if he has the inclination, imagination, will and ability to develop an offense hoping that his UT experience was an anomaly. Sometimes I wonder if Lobo ever left. Ruggerio has not shown me anything so far and might prove to be the anchor around Clawson's neck.
I don't see anybody counting it against him. I do see Clawson counting it for him as part of an experience edge on Hinton. Who's to say Hinton wouldn't be clearly ahead of Wolford if he had extended time to play?
It very well may be true that if Hinton was the junior and Wolford the sophomore that Hinton would be the starter and Wolford the backup.
Another edge that seems to belong to Wolford, perhaps due to experience or perhaps due to study, is that he perhaps reads defenses better. I get the impression that Wolford is something of a coach on the field. That said, the biggest knock against Wolford is that he tries to force the ball into tight situations resulting in interceptions. If that continues, I expect to see Hinton starting early.
But we can't afford to assume any QB is going to have a decent OL and viable running game.