TexasDeac10
Alphonso Smith
I see how he harbors the sentiment, and I can't blame him for it.
The Hitler thing is out of control though. Total Godwin's law, indeed.
The Hitler thing is out of control though. Total Godwin's law, indeed.
People seem to forget that small point. It wasn't just Reagan either. There was considerable support for apartheid in this country. Divestment just wasn't sound conservative doctrine. Reagan's overall record on civil rights is particularly poor and a major reason why Republican struggle to gain traction with minorities.
Good article on Reagan's civil rights record:
http://www.thenation.com/article/15...vil-rights-and-south-african-freedom-struggle
While the Hitler reference is simply Godwin's law, the kid is reflecting common sentiment among many Americans. I'm impressed that a guy who was barely born in the Reagan era has any opinion on his presidency.
People seem to forget that small point. It wasn't just Reagan either. There was considerable support for apartheid in this country. Divestment just wasn't sound conservative doctrine. Reagan's overall record on civil rights is particularly poor and a major reason why Republican struggle to gain traction with minorities.
Good article on Reagan's civil rights record:
http://www.thenation.com/article/15...vil-rights-and-south-african-freedom-struggle
While the Hitler reference is simply Godwin's law, the kid is reflecting common sentiment among many Americans. I'm impressed that a guy who was barely born in the Reagan era has any opinion on his presidency.
People forget a lot when it comes to Reagan and race; it's convenient for them. I'd guess a lot of younger people, especially college aged black students examining his policies for the first time, would be shocked into offering up a hyperbole like that, when most mention of Reagan in the mainstream is usually with this nostalgic reverent tone.
Frye's entitled to his opinion. I'm not going to compare Reagan to Hitler, but can see where he's coming from, and I'm guessing Frye has done a lot more recent research into the subject than others who are just brushing it off.
Yeah, I definitely think it was a shock thing. The idea in 2011 that the president of the United States was openly supportive of apartheid and opposed the Civil Rights Act is pretty shocking to me and I lived through the Reagan era as a child.
Based on the politics board and what I remember from attending Wake only 6 years after Reagan's term ended, Reagan has a lot of support in the Wake community. I'm guessing that most who react so harshly to such comments about Reagan either shared Reagan's support for apartheid, opposition to civil rights legislation and his overall view of race or just don't care about such issues.
Graduate is awesome. History major doesn't give much solace... almost makes it worse that he said that.
How the hell does your perspective become so skewed that you compare Reagan to Hitler?
Fair enough. I'm not in Winston anymore, so I don't have first hand knowledge. The stuff I read on these boards though seems to point in the opposite direction.
First there was Grobe basically calling him (and others) out for not practicing enough, or feeling entitled, or being soft, or something like that. In truth, I don't know what Grobe's saying sometimes. Nevertheless, soon after that Josh had that tweet about how he wasn't going to practice because it was too cold, and he was worried about his hamstring.
Then there's the most recent tweet on this thread where he calls out Coach Reeves for counting his reps? Makes the comment, "I guess 400+ bench isn't good enough for them." I read that as being similar to the kid in school who refuses to do his homework because he feels like he's too smart for it. But again, I know I'm dealing with twitter here. Hard to take anything seriously.
Anyway, that's how I came to that above thought.
When you're not a spoiled rich white kid?