Game six of Scott Satterfield's tenure at Louisville(considered by most to be a complete rebuild year) versus year 6 of Clawson's tenure at Wake.
When you look at Clawson's tenure, D has not been a strength. Seems D did better his first 2-3 years with Grobe recruits. D numbers aren't good. Points allowed generally ok except we've had multiple games in past 3 years where opponents scored over 40. Yardage totals is what sticks out. Giving up 60 points to Louisville is the embarrassment of his tenure, and a super indictment to overall D's lack of talent, size, coaching, and scheme, compared to mid to upper ACC teams for some time now.
Coach Clawson told Stan near the end of the post game show that we have issues on defense. The plays that seem to bother him most was when the Louisville QBs would take off running on bootleg plays and our contain man was nowhere to be found. He said that he knew that the players had been coached better. He didn't throw anyone individually by name under the bus, but there was no doubt that he was pissed about our defense. So if the head coach said we have issues on defense, I have to believe we have issues on defense.
Seriously, our defense just blew Saturday night. My biggest complaint is that we seemed to make no, nada, zilch adjustments at the half. Is the overweight guy with the untucked shirt the defense coordinator? Clueless.
If South Carolina can bounce back, surely we can.
Yep. I don't think the defense truly has a talent problem.
Are there any good posters with Chill in their name?
Let me tell ya something brotha