I wonder if there is some combination of metrics which can be put together to decide what coach would be the safest bet to be successful? My gut tells me Nate Oats, but looking back at the Danny Manning takes it seems the gut takes don't hold as well over time as the analytical ones. I'm guessing it would be a combination of Kenpom like metrics, mixed with recruiting rankings cross-referenced with percentage of recruits who over-performed, transfer in v. transfer out statistics, and overall winning percentage. The tough part is even if all of that came out great for a candidate they still have to fit Wake Forest's "culture" along with who they recruit.