ImTheCaptain
I disagree with you
if guys don't know riscdeac, i don't know what to tell you
I believe the natural order of man and woman to be gods creation. Laugh roll your eyes. Once removed from the natural process of procreation and we are born with hormones to grow through puberty and sexual stimulation during stages of puberty that are not fully understood as a 12 year old for example. If a 12 year old male is molested he will be confused but stimulated. If he continues to be molested and has sexual relations till he's 21 and thinks he is loved by his abuser should we try to change his mind? Why should he feel ashamed if sex two men is totally fine. I don't believe there is any DNA that proves a person is born homosexual or bisexual. If we remove the man and woman, once removed what does it matter how we feel about our relationship with others? If we are truly bisexual do we choose either sex eventually or do we need to have both sexes? If we are questioning our sexuality at 20 years old what makes it so confusing? Are there underlying issues that happened during their younger years? If someone is into recreational deviant sex and decides they identify with beastiality then what makes them any different from deviating from man and woman? Once removed what does any other relationship which is love and sex mean? On the other hand abortion. We started after roe v Wade with 12 weeks. Why 12 weeks? The baby which was called a fetus wasn't viable outside of the womb. So the determination is made. Here we are years later using methods for partial birth abortion. Partial birth? So 12 weeks, 15, 20, it's not an issue anymore. The original aborting a life depending on the woman to feed and nourish this life naturally was destroyed. Once we said that life can be taken it really doesn't matter when. Am I making sense? Partial birth babies are born and taken to a room and left to die. I know I'm mixing apples and oranges but the natural order of god given life. Once removed I don't care if you love a goat. I think there is a chance there is confusion but it's too late now with transsexuals and body mutilation. I don't care if Caitlyn finally removed her manhood. Does she have ovaries? Uterus? Can she menstruate? Bear children? She's pumped up with hormones and surgery to the fullest extent. She thinks or believes she should have been a woman? Where in her body? In her mind? Call me what you want but doesn't anyone ever think it through rather than everyone hates all these people? Something's not right. Instead of shunning gays back in the 60s and 70s they should have been embraced and loved. But maybe loved with compassion and help. Just my thoughts that nobody here will ever to hear. I should delete this but I won't. Don't comment on no paragraphs and my grammar. I'm just flowing. It's a psychological term. The docs around here know what it means.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Texas is close to passing a similar bill.
I guess they don't care about the fallout NC left for them.
I don't expect the NCAA and pro leagues to have the balls to say no to hosting events in Jerry World and Houston.
Nor should they. Sports should stay out of legislating state politics. The NCAA can't even enforce their own rules.
Nor should they. Sports should stay out of legislating state politics. The NCAA can't even enforce their own rules.
This doesn't sound like a very free-market approach.
Nor should they. Sports should stay out of legislating state politics. The NCAA can't even enforce their own rules.
Mebane, Reff, you've got it backwards. The hate-filled legislation by the state politicians created the actions of sports groups. Every American and group have the right to speak out on things politicians do. Didn't Lincoln say something like,"Not ot protest when there is just cause is a sin"?
Maybe black people should have kept their mouths shut about Jim Crow and segregation. Maybe Branch Rickey shouldn't have signed Jackie Robinson.
Denying people the right to act according to what they imagine themselves to be is substantially different from denying people the right to be what they are objectively. The equating of sexual desire and imagination with actual ethnic or racial fact is the height of insult and degradation. People may imagine whatever they wish; but demanding that everyone accept what they imagine to be fact is absurd especially when what is imagined contradicts objective fact. On the other hand, denying people the liberty of being what they actually are is in fact evil.
But I am not going to argue with you, especially since you demean everyone who disagrees with your certitude.
Denying people the right to act according to what they imagine themselves to be is substantially different from denying people the right to be what they are objectively. The equating of sexual desire and imagination with actual ethnic or racial fact is the height of insult and degradation. People may imagine whatever they wish; but demanding that everyone accept what they imagine to be fact is absurd especially when what is imagined contradicts objective fact. On the other hand, denying people the liberty of being what they actually are is in fact evil.
But I am not going to argue with you, especially since you demean everyone who disagrees with your certitude.
Denying people the right to act according to what they imagine themselves to be is substantially different from denying people the right to be what they are objectively. The equating of sexual desire and imagination with actual ethnic or racial fact is the height of insult and degradation. People may imagine whatever they wish; but demanding that everyone accept what they imagine to be fact is absurd especially when what is imagined contradicts objective fact. On the other hand, denying people the liberty of being what they actually are is in fact evil.
But I am not going to argue with you, especially since you demean everyone who disagrees with your certitude.