• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

2018-2019 NHL Thread – Thunderstorm Warning

pourdeac said:
Over the past 5 years, the road team won 13 times and the home team won 17 times. 4 of the series split 3-3. That's not much of an advantage.
Click to expand...

Conveniently leaving out this year, but OK.

Home teams however are 50-22 since 2006 and 30-6 in Games 1-3 since then
 
Fuck off Pittsburgh

07ec2474e2156c179dac1a714b0a92f7.jpg
 
Shame bc Nashville was robbed of an earlier goal that would have changed the whole complexion of the game.
 
Spot the Wonder said:
That goal was a thing of beauty
Click to expand...
Haglin finally looked like he did last year and outworked his way to the puck. Hainsey played really well too..way better than the last 2 Nashville games where he was a turnover machine.
 
Last edited:
38.4 Situations Subject to Video Review - The following situations are subject to review by the Video Goal Judge:

(viii) The video review process shall be permitted to assist the Referees in determining the legitimacy of all potential goals (e.g. to ensure they are “good hockey goals”). For example (but not limited to), pucks that enter the net by going through the net meshing, pucks that enter the net from underneath the net frame, pucks that hit the spectator netting prior to being directed immediately into the goal, pucks that enter the net undetected by the Referee, etc. This would also include situations whereby the Referee stops play or is in the process of stopping the play because he has lost sight of the puck and it is subsequently determined by video review that the puck crosses (or has crossed) the goal line and enters the net as the culmination of a continuous play where the result was unaffected by the whistle (i.e., the timing of the whistle was irrelevant to the puck entering the net at the end of a continuous play).
 
That rule has nothing to do with what happened.

The only good thing about the Pens winning is that Subban lost.
 
The rule is specifically referring to if the puck is on its way in and then the whistle blows. That is a continuous play. Not what happened yesterday.
 
These are the type of things someone from the NHL should bother to explain. Either the ref or at least someone after the game
 
Deacon said:
The rule is specifically referring to if the puck is on its way in and then the whistle blows. That is a continuous play. Not what happened yesterday.
Click to expand...

It seems like the very definition of what happened yesterday.
 
Keep thinking that. Give an example of it being interpreted your way.
 
Buttermaker said:
It seems like the very definition of what happened yesterday.
Click to expand...
If the puck had gone in all on its own after the ref decided to blow the whistle (continuous), then that rule would have applied. It was hit in so...no.
 
Deacon said:
Keep thinking that. Give an example of it being interpreted your way.
Click to expand...

The puck was in a trajectory towards the net before the tap in. The refs whistle in no way affected Sissons ability to tap it in. There wasn't a Pens player anywhere near Sissons, nobody just stopped playing for Pittsburgh that led to the puck ending up in the net.
 
pourdeac said:
If the puck had gone in all on its own after the ref decided to blow the whistle (continuous), then that rule would have applied. It was hit in so...no.
Click to expand...

"enters the net as the culmination of a continuous play where the result was unaffected by the whistle (i.e., the timing of the whistle was irrelevant to the puck entering the net at the end of a continuous play)." Just choosing not to read that?
 
zqglass said:
"enters the net as the culmination of a continuous play where the result was unaffected by the whistle (i.e., the timing of the whistle was irrelevant to the puck entering the net at the end of a continuous play)." Just choosing not to read that?
Click to expand...
No, I can read just fine. Continuous play means no one else touches the puck. Sissons would have gotten credit for scoring a goal had the whistle not blown...which is a new play.....it's called "a shot" afterall. Said rule was put in place to avoid situations where the goalie didn't really stop **a shot** on goal but the whistle blew.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top