Don't disagree. And FSU suddenly playing well is a problem.FWIW, think FSU might take down UNC on Saturday.
I'd be inclined to agree with you, but the way FSU folded against them @ UNC gives me pause.FWIW, think FSU might take down UNC on Saturday.
The Noles are going to be 8 point dogs; so, UNC is likely to win, but FSU matches up reasonably well with UNC. UNC had a 30-4 second half run in that game, and still only won by 8. FWIW, FSU's defense is first in creating TOs; UNC's is last, but OTOH, UNC is #1 at getting to the line in conference games, and FSU fouls more than any other team, due to their uber-aggressive D. So, the reffs are going to play a big role in the outcome.I'd be inclined to agree with you, but the way FSU folded against them @ UNC gives me pause.
That game featured an even bigger turnaround than our game @ UNC. FSU had UNC on the ropes and then completely shit the bed down the stretch.
But yeah, UNC is gonna lose some games in conference... This one seems as likely as any other, I guess.
Utah's two games versus Wash St this year.Just looked at our old pals Utah and their PAC-12 schedule. It feels familiar somehow.
5-0 at home
0-4 on the road.
Personally, I think a smart conference would set a NET threshold that a team needs to be above or else it is ineligible for the conference tournament. Protect your bubble teams from bad losses!Starting next year, the Big Ten will only allow 15 of its 18 teams to their conference basketball tournament (which is a really weird sentence to write).
They'll still get bounced out of the NCAA tourney early
One of the tiebreakers (after head to head) for the West Coast Conference tourney is each team's NET rating. Also, that conference stacks the tourament so that the top two seeds have a bye into the semifinals. So, that scheme makes it unlikely that a potential tourney team will play a really low rated NET team.Personally, I think a smart conference would set a NET threshold that a team needs to be above or else it is ineligible for the conference tournament. Protect your bubble teams from bad losses!
*This would never happen for a multitude of reasons
Personally, I think a smart conference would set a NET threshold that a team needs to be above or else it is ineligible for the conference tournament. Protect your bubble teams from bad losses!
*This would never happen for a multitude of reasons
A smart conference would flex a conference schedule to guarantee the top teams more Q1 games.