Junebug
Well-known member
This is the accusation. I understand the accusation. Im asking what she actually did that is indefensible.
But why male models?
This is the accusation. I understand the accusation. Im asking what she actually did that is indefensible.
Except this absolute crap as EVERY dollar given to the foundation has a\been accounted for and none went to her or Bill. In fact over 87% has gone to specific projects which is a very high number.
But keep deluding yourself.
I like how you define wrongdoing that isn't being alleged in order to deflate an attack. In this case, donations didn't go to fatten the wallets of Bill or Hill so nothing is wrong.
Prosecutor: Mr. Chappelle, what would it take to convince you that R. Kelly is guilty?
Dave Chappelle: Okay, I'd have to see a video of him singing "Pee On You," two forms of government ID, a police officer there to verify the whole thing, four or five of my buddies and Neal taking notes, and R. Kelly's grandma to confirm his identity.
R. Kelly's Grandma: That's my Robert, always peeing on people.
But why male models?
Does RJ believe anything RJ writes?
I like how you define wrongdoing that isn't being alleged in order to deflate an attack. In this case, donations didn't go to fatten the wallets of Bill or Hill so nothing is wrong.
Junebug specifically said that Clinton was personally enriching herself through her position.
Junebug specifically said that Clinton was personally enriching herself through her position.
Yeah, I mean she plainly did, be it through Bill's speech fees ($10s of millions of dollars from foreign interests) or the foundation paying for Bill's "travel" expenses ($12 million dollars in 2011 alone).
She must be the best white collar criminal in American history. The accusations and the inability of the worlds most powerful and wealthy justice system to bring her down in 20 years is simply astounding.
She should be able to handle the rest of the world no problem
Yeah, I mean she plainly did, be it through Bill's speech fees ($10s of millions of dollars from foreign interests) or the foundation paying for Bill's "travel" expenses ($12 million dollars in 2011 alone).
Yeah, I mean she plainly did, be it through Bill's speech fees ($10s of millions of dollars from foreign interests) or the foundation paying for Bill's "travel" expenses ($12 million dollars in 2011 alone).
So who is a charitable foundation allowed to take money from?
Are you against the market determining speaker fees? Or are you suggesting they were getting paid over market rate for a former president and possibly future president?
I just hear from the right that this is somehow illegal. I'll admit it's sketchy and they certainly could have prevented that by simply not taking as much as they could. But I haven't see anybody answer these basic questions.
I love that "not illegal" is the new standard.